Lemieux-Charles Louise, Chambers Larry W, Cockerill Rhonda, Jaglal Susan, Brazil Kevin, Cohen Carole, LeClair Ken, Dalziel Bill, Schulman Barbara
Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, McMurrich Building, 12 Queen's Park Crescent West, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada.
Gerontologist. 2005 Aug;45(4):456-64. doi: 10.1093/geront/45.4.456.
The Dementia Care Networks' Study examined the effectiveness of four community-based, not-for-profit dementia networks. The study involved assessing the relationship between the types of administrative and service-delivery exchanges that occurred among the networked agencies and the network members' perception of the effectiveness of these exchanges.
With the use of a case-study method, the evolution, structure, and processes of each network were documented. Social network analysis using a standardized questionnaire completed by member agencies identified patterns of administrative and clinical exchanges among networked agencies.
Differences were found between the four networks in terms of their perceptions of service-delivery effectiveness; perceptions of administrative effectiveness did not factor significantly. Exchanges between groups of agencies (cliques) within each of the four networks were found to be more critical than those between individual agencies within each network.
Integration-measured by the types of exchanges within as opposed to across networks-differentiated the four networks studied. This research contributes to our understanding of the use of multiple measures to evaluate the inner workings of service delivery and their impact on elder health and elder health care.
痴呆症护理网络研究考察了四个基于社区的非营利性痴呆症网络的有效性。该研究涉及评估网络机构之间发生的行政和服务提供交流类型与网络成员对这些交流有效性的认知之间的关系。
采用案例研究方法,记录了每个网络的发展、结构和流程。通过成员机构填写标准化问卷进行社会网络分析,确定了网络机构之间行政和临床交流的模式。
四个网络在对服务提供有效性的认知方面存在差异;对行政有效性的认知未产生显著影响。发现四个网络中各机构组(小团体)之间的交流比每个网络中单个机构之间的交流更为关键。
通过网络内部而非网络之间的交流类型来衡量的整合,区分了所研究的四个网络。本研究有助于我们理解使用多种措施来评估服务提供的内部运作及其对老年人健康和老年保健的影响。