Chambers Larry W, Sivananthan Saskia, Brayne Carol
Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Adv Prev Med. 2017;2017:9708413. doi: 10.1155/2017/9708413. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
Despite efforts to raise awareness and develop guidelines for care of individuals with dementia, reports of poor detection and inadequate management persist. This has led to a call for more identification of people with dementia, that is, screening individuals who may or may not complain of symptoms of dementia in both acute settings and primary care. The following should be considered before recommending screening for dementia among individuals in the general population. . Low prevalence reduces positive predictive value of tests and screening tests will miss people who have dementia and identify people who do not have dementia in substantial numbers. . The clinical course of dementia has not yet been shown to be amenable to intervention. Misdiagnosis and overdiagnosis can have significant long-term effects including stigmatization, loss of employment, and autonomy. . Health systems do not have the capacity to respond to increased demand resulting from screening. In conclusion, at present attention to life-course risk reduction and support in the community for frail and cognitively impaired older adults is a better use of limited healthcare resources than introduction of unevaluated dementia screening programs.
尽管人们努力提高对痴呆症患者护理的认识并制定相关指南,但关于检测不力和管理不足的报告仍屡见不鲜。这引发了对更多痴呆症患者识别工作的呼吁,即在急性病医疗机构和初级保健机构中,对可能有或可能没有痴呆症症状主诉的个体进行筛查。在建议对普通人群中的个体进行痴呆症筛查之前,应考虑以下几点:患病率低会降低检测的阳性预测值,筛查测试会遗漏患有痴呆症的人,且会大量识别出没有痴呆症的人。痴呆症的临床病程尚未显示出可通过干预得到改善。误诊和过度诊断可能会产生重大的长期影响,包括污名化、失业和丧失自主权。卫生系统没有能力应对筛查导致的需求增加。总之,目前相较于引入未经评估的痴呆症筛查项目,关注生命历程中的风险降低以及为体弱和认知受损的老年人提供社区支持,是对有限医疗资源的更好利用。