Suppr超能文献

自我管理的生态学方法:以糖尿病为例。

Ecological approaches to self-management: the case of diabetes.

作者信息

Fisher Edwin B, Brownson Carol A, O'Toole Mary L, Shetty Gowri, Anwuri Victoria V, Glasgow Russell E

机构信息

Washington University, Division of Health Behavior Research, 4444 Forest Park Ave, St Louis, MO 63108, USA.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2005 Sep;95(9):1523-35. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.066084. Epub 2005 Jul 28.

Abstract

In the Diabetes Initiative of The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, an ecological perspective helped identify the following key resources and supports for self-management (RSSM): individualized assessment, collaborative goal setting, skills enhancement, follow-up and support, access to resources, and continuity of quality clinical care. These RSSM reflect the grounding of diabetes self-management in the context of social and environmental influences. Research supports the value of each of these key resources and supports. Differences among self-management interventions may be seen as complementary, rather than conflicting, ways of providing RSSM. This way of understanding differences among interventions may aid development of varied programs to reach diverse audiences. In contrast to the "5 A's" model of key provider services (Assess, Advise, Agree, Assist, and Arrange), RSSM articulate self-management from the perspective of individuals' needs. Both approaches emphasize identification of goals, teaching of skills, and facilitation and reinforcement of the use of those skills.

摘要

在罗伯特·伍德·约翰逊基金会的糖尿病倡议中,一种生态视角有助于确定以下自我管理的关键资源和支持(RSSM):个性化评估、协作式目标设定、技能提升、随访与支持、资源获取以及优质临床护理的连续性。这些RSSM反映了糖尿病自我管理在社会和环境影响背景下的基础。研究支持这些关键资源和支持中的每一项的价值。自我管理干预措施之间的差异可能被视为提供RSSM的互补而非冲突方式。这种理解干预措施差异的方式可能有助于开发针对不同受众的多样化项目。与关键提供者服务的“5A”模型(评估、建议、商定、协助和安排)不同,RSSM从个人需求的角度阐述自我管理。两种方法都强调目标的确定、技能的传授以及促进和强化这些技能的使用。

相似文献

1
Ecological approaches to self-management: the case of diabetes.
Am J Public Health. 2005 Sep;95(9):1523-35. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.066084. Epub 2005 Jul 28.
4
The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Diabetes Initiative: demonstration projects emphasizing self-management.
Diabetes Educ. 2007 Jan-Feb;33(1):83-4, 86-8, 91-2, passim. doi: 10.1177/0145721706297454.
5
Perspectives on self-management from the Diabetes Initiative of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
Diabetes Educ. 2007 Jun;33 Suppl 6:216S-224S. doi: 10.1177/0145721707304124.
8
An assessment of patient education and self-management in diabetes disease management--two case studies.
Popul Health Manag. 2008 Dec;11(6):329-40. doi: 10.1089/pop.2008.0012.
9
Patients taking control of diabetes.
Healthplan. 1997 Mar-Apr;38(2):56-9, 63.

引用本文的文献

1
Multilevel Interventions Demonstrate Mixed Effectiveness for Improving Blood Pressure Outcomes: A Rapid Review.
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jun 11;13(12):1397. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13121397.
7
Self-Care Practices and Their Role in the Control of Diabetes: A Narrative Review.
Cureus. 2023 Jul 5;15(7):e41409. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41409. eCollection 2023 Jul.
9
The "Ups and Downs" of Living With Type 2 Diabetes Among Working Adults in the Rural South.
J Prim Care Community Health. 2022 Jan-Dec;13:21501319221143715. doi: 10.1177/21501319221143715.
10
Domesticating the condition: Design lessons gained from a marathon on how to cope with barriers imposed by type 1 diabetes.
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 7;13:1013877. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1013877. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Resources for Health: A Social-Ecological Intervention for Supporting Self-management of Chronic Conditions.
J Health Psychol. 2001 Dec;6(6):693-705. doi: 10.1177/135910530100600607.
2
Directive and nondirective social support in diabetes management.
Int J Behav Med. 1997;4(2):131-44. doi: 10.1207/s15327558ijbm0402_3.
4
Development and validation of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC).
Med Care. 2005 May;43(5):436-44. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000160375.47920.8c.
6
A practical randomized trial to improve diabetes care.
J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Dec;19(12):1167-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30425.x.
7
Promoting glycemic control through diabetes self-management: evaluating a patient activation intervention.
Patient Educ Couns. 2005 Jan;56(1):28-34. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2003.11.008.
8
The Chronic Illness Resources Survey: cross-validation and sensitivity to intervention.
Health Educ Res. 2005 Aug;20(4):402-9. doi: 10.1093/her/cyg140. Epub 2004 Nov 30.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验