• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用对话式代理进行的心血管代谢疾病管理干预措施的参与:系统评价的方案。

Engagement With Conversational Agent-Enabled Interventions in Cardiometabolic Disease Management: Protocol for a Systematic Review.

机构信息

Baker Department of Cardiovascular Research, Translation and Implementation, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.

Centre for Research Excellence in Digital Technology to Transform Chronic Disease Outcomes, National Health and Medical Research Council, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Aug 7;13:e52973. doi: 10.2196/52973.

DOI:10.2196/52973
PMID:39110504
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11339562/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cardiometabolic diseases (CMDs) are a group of interrelated conditions, including heart failure and diabetes, that increase the risk of cardiovascular and metabolic complications. The rising number of Australians with CMDs has necessitated new strategies for those managing these conditions, such as digital health interventions. The effectiveness of digital health interventions in supporting people with CMDs is dependent on the extent to which users engage with the tools. Augmenting digital health interventions with conversational agents, technologies that interact with people using natural language, may enhance engagement because of their human-like attributes. To date, no systematic review has compiled evidence on how design features influence the engagement of conversational agent-enabled interventions supporting people with CMDs. This review seeks to address this gap, thereby guiding developers in creating more engaging and effective tools for CMD management.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this systematic review is to synthesize evidence pertaining to conversational agent-enabled intervention design features and their impacts on the engagement of people managing CMD.

METHODS

The review is conducted in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and reported in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Searches will be conducted in the Ovid (Medline), Web of Science, and Scopus databases, which will be run again prior to manuscript submission. Inclusion criteria will consist of primary research studies reporting on conversational agent-enabled interventions, including measures of engagement, in adults with CMD. Data extraction will seek to capture the perspectives of people with CMD on the use of conversational agent-enabled interventions. Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools will be used to evaluate the overall quality of evidence collected.

RESULTS

This review was initiated in May 2023 and was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) in June 2023, prior to title and abstract screening. Full-text screening of articles was completed in July 2023 and data extraction began August 2023. Final searches were conducted in April 2024 prior to finalizing the review and the manuscript was submitted for peer review in July 2024.

CONCLUSIONS

This review will synthesize diverse observations pertaining to conversational agent-enabled intervention design features and their impacts on engagement among people with CMDs. These observations can be used to guide the development of more engaging conversational agent-enabled interventions, thereby increasing the likelihood of regular intervention use and improved CMD health outcomes. Additionally, this review will identify gaps in the literature in terms of how engagement is reported, thereby highlighting areas for future exploration and supporting researchers in advancing the understanding of conversational agent-enabled interventions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42023431579; https://tinyurl.com/55cxkm26.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/52973.

摘要

背景

心脏代谢疾病(CMD)是一组相互关联的疾病,包括心力衰竭和糖尿病,这些疾病会增加心血管和代谢并发症的风险。越来越多的澳大利亚人患有 CMD,这就需要为这些患者制定新的管理策略,例如数字健康干预措施。数字健康干预措施在支持 CMD 患者方面的有效性取决于用户对这些工具的参与程度。通过使用自然语言与用户交互的会话代理等技术增强数字健康干预措施,可以通过其类似人类的属性提高用户的参与度。迄今为止,尚无系统评价综合了设计功能如何影响支持 CMD 患者的会话代理启用干预措施的参与度。本综述旨在解决这一差距,从而指导开发人员为 CMD 管理创建更具吸引力和更有效的工具。

目的

本系统评价旨在综合与会话代理启用的干预设计特征及其对管理 CMD 的人群的参与度的影响相关的证据。

方法

该综述按照 Cochrane 干预措施系统评价手册进行,并按照 PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)指南进行报告。将在 Ovid(Medline)、Web of Science 和 Scopus 数据库中进行检索,在提交手稿前将再次运行这些数据库检索。纳入标准将包括报告关于成年人 CMD 的会话代理启用干预措施以及参与度措施的主要研究。数据提取将试图捕捉 CMD 患者对使用会话代理启用的干预措施的看法。Joanna Briggs Institute 批判性评价工具将用于评估收集的证据的总体质量。

结果

本综述于 2023 年 5 月启动,并于 2023 年 6 月在国际前瞻性系统评价注册处(PROSPERO)进行了注册,然后进行标题和摘要筛选。2023 年 7 月完成了文章的全文筛选,并于 2023 年 8 月开始数据提取。2024 年 4 月进行了最后一次检索,然后完成了综述,并于 2024 年 7 月提交同行评审。

结论

本综述将综合有关会话代理启用的干预设计特征及其对 CMD 患者参与度的影响的各种观察结果。这些观察结果可用于指导更具吸引力的会话代理启用的干预措施的开发,从而增加常规干预措施使用的可能性并改善 CMD 的健康结果。此外,本综述将确定报告参与度的文献中的差距,从而突出未来探索的领域,并支持研究人员推进对会话代理启用的干预措施的理解。

试验注册

PROSPERO CRD42023431579;https://tinyurl.com/55cxkm26。

国际注册报告标识符(IRRID):DERR1-10.2196/52973。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee4b/11339562/694a2f48466e/resprot_v13i1e52973_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee4b/11339562/694a2f48466e/resprot_v13i1e52973_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee4b/11339562/694a2f48466e/resprot_v13i1e52973_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Engagement With Conversational Agent-Enabled Interventions in Cardiometabolic Disease Management: Protocol for a Systematic Review.使用对话式代理进行的心血管代谢疾病管理干预措施的参与:系统评价的方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Aug 7;13:e52973. doi: 10.2196/52973.
2
Defining and Measuring Engagement and Adherence in Digital Mental Health Interventions: Protocol for an Umbrella Review.定义和衡量数字心理健康干预中的参与度和依从性:一项伞状综述方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jul 28;14:e73438. doi: 10.2196/73438.
3
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
4
Engaging Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment in Digital Health Technologies: Protocol for a Scoping Review.让认知障碍老年人参与数字健康技术:一项范围综述的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jun 3;14:e65515. doi: 10.2196/65515.
5
Education support services for improving school engagement and academic performance of children and adolescents with a chronic health condition.改善患有慢性病的儿童和青少年的学校参与度和学业成绩的教育支持服务。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 8;2(2):CD011538. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011538.pub2.
6
Computer and mobile technology interventions for self-management in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病自我管理的计算机和移动技术干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 23;5(5):CD011425. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011425.pub2.
7
Interventions to improve safe and effective medicines use by consumers: an overview of systematic reviews.改善消费者安全有效用药的干预措施:系统评价概述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 29;2014(4):CD007768. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007768.pub3.
8
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
9
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
10
Conversational AI and Vaccine Communication: Systematic Review of the Evidence.会话式人工智能与疫苗传播:证据的系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Oct 3;25:e42758. doi: 10.2196/42758.

本文引用的文献

1
Large language models in medicine.医学中的大型语言模型。
Nat Med. 2023 Aug;29(8):1930-1940. doi: 10.1038/s41591-023-02448-8. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
2
Large language models will not replace healthcare professionals: curbing popular fears and hype.大语言模型不会取代医疗保健专业人员:抑制普遍的恐惧和炒作。
J R Soc Med. 2023 May;116(5):181-182. doi: 10.1177/01410768231173123. Epub 2023 May 18.
3
Artificial Hallucinations in ChatGPT: Implications in Scientific Writing.ChatGPT中的人工幻觉:对科学写作的影响
Cureus. 2023 Feb 19;15(2):e35179. doi: 10.7759/cureus.35179. eCollection 2023 Feb.
4
Integrating avatar technology into a telemedicine application in heart failure patients : A pilot study.将头像技术整合到心力衰竭患者的远程医疗应用中:一项试点研究。
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2023 Dec;135(23-24):680-684. doi: 10.1007/s00508-022-02150-8. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
5
The revised JBI critical appraisal tool for the assessment of risk of bias for randomized controlled trials.JBI 偏倚风险评估工具修订版用于评估随机对照试验的偏倚风险。
JBI Evid Synth. 2023 Mar 1;21(3):494-506. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-22-00430.
6
Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risks Collaboration, 1990-2021.全球心血管疾病负担与风险协作组,1990 - 2021年。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Dec 20;80(25):2372-2425. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.11.001.
7
Quantitative User Data From a Chatbot Developed for Women With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Observational Study.为妊娠期糖尿病女性开发的聊天机器人的定量用户数据:观察性研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Apr 18;6(4):e28091. doi: 10.2196/28091.
8
The Use of Artificial Intelligence-Based Conversational Agents (Chatbots) for Weight Loss: Scoping Review and Practical Recommendations.基于人工智能的对话代理(聊天机器人)在减肥中的应用:范围综述与实用建议。
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Apr 13;10(4):e32578. doi: 10.2196/32578.
9
Chatbot-Delivered Psychotherapy for Adults With Depressive and Anxiety Symptoms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression.针对有抑郁和焦虑症状成年人的聊天机器人心理治疗:一项系统评价与元回归分析
Behav Ther. 2022 Mar;53(2):334-347. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2021.09.007. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
10
Using AI chatbots to provide self-help depression interventions for university students: A randomized trial of effectiveness.使用人工智能聊天机器人为大学生提供自助式抑郁症干预措施:一项有效性随机试验。
Internet Interv. 2022 Jan 6;27:100495. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2022.100495. eCollection 2022 Mar.