Cattaruzza Sabrina, Perris Roberto
Department of Evolutionary and Functional Biology University of Parma, Viale delle Scienze 11/A PARMA 43100, Italy.
Matrix Biol. 2005 Sep;24(6):400-17. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2005.06.005.
By virtue of their multifunctional nature, proteoglycans (PGs) are thought to govern the process of cell movement in numerous physiological and pathological contexts, spanning from early embryonic development to tumour invasion and metastasis. The precise mode by which they influence this process is still fragmentary, but evidence is accruing that they may affect it in a multifaceted manner. PGs bound to the plasma membrane mediate the polyvalent interaction of the cell with matrix constituents and with molecules of the neighbouring cells' surfaces; they modulate the activity of receptors implicated in the recognition of these components; and they participate in the perception and convergence of growth- and motility-promoting cues contributed by soluble factors. Through some of these interactions several PGs transduce to pro-motile cells crucial intracellular signals that are likely to be essential for their mobility. A regulated shedding of certain membrane-intercalated PGs seems to provide an additional level of control of cell movement. Coincidentally, matrix-associated PGs may govern cell migration by structuring permissive and non-permissive migratory paths and, when directly secreted by the moving cells, may alternatively create favourable or hostile microenvironments. To exert this latter, indirect effect on cell movement, matrix PGs strongly rely upon their primary molecular partners, such as hyaluronan, link proteins, tenascins, collagens and low-affinity cell surface receptors, whereas a further finer control is provided by a highly regulated proteolytic processing of the PGs accounted by both the migrating cells themselves and cells of their surrounding tissues. Overall, PGs seem to play an important role in determining the migratory phenotype of a cell by initiating, directing and terminating cell movement in a spatio-temporally controlled fashion. This implies that the "anti-adhesive and/or "anti-migratory" properties that have previously been assigned to certain PGs may be re-interpreted as being a means by which these macromolecules elaborate haptotaxis-like mechanisms imposing directionality upon the moving cells. Since these conditions would allow cells to be led to given tissue locations and become immobilized at these sites, a primary function may be ascribed to PGs in the dictation of a "stop or go" choice of the migrating cells.
由于蛋白聚糖(PGs)具有多功能特性,人们认为它们在从早期胚胎发育到肿瘤侵袭和转移的众多生理和病理环境中,调控着细胞运动过程。它们影响这一过程的确切方式仍不完整,但越来越多的证据表明,它们可能以多方面的方式影响该过程。与质膜结合的蛋白聚糖介导细胞与基质成分以及相邻细胞表面分子的多价相互作用;它们调节参与识别这些成分的受体的活性;并且它们参与由可溶性因子贡献的促进生长和运动的信号的感知和汇聚。通过其中一些相互作用,几种蛋白聚糖向促运动细胞转导关键的细胞内信号,这些信号可能对它们的移动至关重要。某些插入膜的蛋白聚糖的受调控脱落似乎为细胞运动提供了额外的控制水平。巧合的是,与基质相关的蛋白聚糖可能通过构建允许和不允许的迁移路径来控制细胞迁移,并且当由移动细胞直接分泌时,可能会创造有利或不利的微环境。为了对细胞运动产生后一种间接影响,基质蛋白聚糖强烈依赖于它们的主要分子伙伴,如透明质酸、连接蛋白、腱生蛋白、胶原蛋白和低亲和力细胞表面受体,而迁移细胞自身及其周围组织的细胞对蛋白聚糖进行的高度受调控的蛋白水解加工则提供了进一步的精细控制。总体而言,蛋白聚糖似乎在以时空控制的方式启动、引导和终止细胞运动从而决定细胞的迁移表型方面发挥重要作用。这意味着先前赋予某些蛋白聚糖的“抗黏附”和/或“抗迁移”特性可能被重新解释为这些大分子构建趋触性样机制的一种方式,该机制为移动细胞施加方向性。由于这些条件将允许细胞被引导到特定的组织位置并在这些位点固定下来,因此可以将蛋白聚糖的主要功能归因于对迁移细胞“停止或继续”选择的指令。