Sitbon O, McLaughlin V V, Badesch D B, Barst R J, Black C, Galiè N, Humbert M, Rainisio M, Rubin L J, Simonneau G
Centre des Maladies Vasculaires Pulmonaires, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, Université Paris-Sud, 157 rue de la Porte de Trivaux, 92141 Clamart, France.
Thorax. 2005 Dec;60(12):1025-30. doi: 10.1136/thx.2005.040618. Epub 2005 Jul 29.
The oral dual endothelin receptor antagonist bosentan improves exercise capacity and delays clinical worsening in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension, but its use could delay starting intravenous epoprostenol, a life saving treatment.
Survival in patients with functional class III idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) treated with bosentan in clinical trials was compared with historical data from similar patients treated with epoprostenol in the clinic. Statistical methods were used to adjust for possible underlying differences between the two groups.
Baseline factors for the 139 patients treated with bosentan and the 346 treated with epoprostenol suggested that the epoprostenol cohort had more severe disease-that is, a lower cardiac index (2.01 v 2.39 l/min/m2) and higher pressures and resistance. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates after 1 and 2 years were 97% and 91%, respectively, in the bosentan cohort and 91% and 84% in the epoprostenol cohort. Cox regression analyses adjusting for differences in baseline factors showed a greater probability of death in the epoprostenol cohort (hazard ratio 2.2 (95% confidence interval 1.2 to 4.0) in the model adjusted for haemodynamics). Alternative regression analyses and analyses to adjust for different data collection dates gave consistently similar results. When matched cohorts of 83 patients each were selected, survival estimates were similar. In the bosentan cohort 87% and 75% of patients followed for 1 and 2 years, respectively, remained on monotherapy.
No evidence was found to suggest that initial treatment with oral bosentan, followed by or with the addition of other treatment if needed, adversely affected the long term outcome compared with initial intravenous epoprostenol in patients with class III idiopathic PAH.
口服双重内皮素受体拮抗剂波生坦可改善肺动脉高压患者的运动能力并延缓临床病情恶化,但其使用可能会延迟开始使用挽救生命的静脉注射依前列醇治疗。
将临床试验中接受波生坦治疗的Ⅲ级特发性肺动脉高压(PAH)患者的生存率与临床中接受依前列醇治疗的类似患者的历史数据进行比较。使用统计方法调整两组之间可能存在的潜在差异。
139例接受波生坦治疗的患者和346例接受依前列醇治疗的患者的基线因素表明,依前列醇组的疾病更为严重,即心脏指数较低(2.01对2.39升/分钟/平方米),压力和阻力较高。波生坦组1年和2年后的Kaplan-Meier生存估计分别为97%和91%,依前列醇组为91%和84%。对基线因素差异进行调整的Cox回归分析显示,依前列醇组的死亡概率更高(在根据血流动力学调整的模型中,风险比为2.2(95%置信区间1.2至4.0))。替代回归分析和针对不同数据收集日期进行调整的分析得出了一致相似的结果。当每组选择83例匹配队列时,生存估计相似。在波生坦组中,随访1年和2年的患者分别有87%和75%仍接受单药治疗。
未发现有证据表明,与Ⅲ级特发性PAH患者初始静脉注射依前列醇相比,初始口服波生坦治疗,必要时随后或加用其他治疗,会对长期预后产生不利影响。