• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿莫西林-舒巴坦与阿莫西林-克拉维酸治疗阿根廷儿童非复发性急性中耳炎的疗效比较

Amoxicillin-sulbactam versus amoxicillin-clavulanic acid for the treatment of non-recurrent-acute otitis media in Argentinean children.

作者信息

Casellas Javier María, Israele Víctor, Marín Marcelo, Ishida María T, Heguilen Ricardo, Soutric Jorge, Arenoso Héctor, Sibbald Andrés, Stamboulian Daniel

机构信息

Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Hospital de Niños de San Isidro, French 3085, 1425 Buenos Aires, Argentina.

出版信息

Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2005 Sep;69(9):1225-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2005.03.016.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijporl.2005.03.016
PMID:16061111
Abstract

Streptococcus pneumoniae (Sp) and Haemophilus influenzae (Hi) are the leading bacterial cause of acute otitis media (AOM), having the nasopharynx (NP) as their reservoir. In October 2001 we began a prospective, multicenter, randomized, evaluator blind study, comparing the efficacy of amoxicillin-sulbactam (Ax/S) and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (Ax/C) for the treatment of non-recurrent AOM (nr-AOM). Both antimicrobial susceptibility (AS) to Ax/S and Ax/C from Sp and Hi carried by study children (aged 6-48 months with nr-AOM) and, clinical outcome after treatment with high dose of either Ax/C (7:1) or Ax/S (4:1) (amoxicillin dose: 80 mg/(kg day), b.i.d. for 10 days) were assessed. Nasal cultures (NCs) were taken at Day 0. Follow-up NCs, were done only for Sp carriers. On final analysis 247/289 pts (85.5%) were fully evaluable (120 Ax/S and 127 Ax/C). NP carriage rate of Hi and Sp at Day 0 was 32.2% (93/289 pts) and 28.7% (83/289 pts), respectively. Persistent Sp carriage was detected only in 2 pts. Hi betalactamase positive rate was 13% (12/93). MICs for Ax/S and Ax/C were identical when tested against Sp and Hi isolates (range < or = 0.016-1.0 and < or = 0.016-0.25 mg/L, respectively). Clinical efficacy at Days 12-14 and 28-42 were 98.3% (115/117) and 94.2% (97/103) for Ax/S; and 98.3% (115/117) and 95.1% (98/103) for Ax/C, respectively (pNS). We conclude, that Sp and Hi isolated from NCs of nr-AOM pts were highly sensitive to both drugs and correlated with high clinical efficacy rate.

摘要

肺炎链球菌(Sp)和流感嗜血杆菌(Hi)是急性中耳炎(AOM)的主要细菌病因,其储存宿主为鼻咽部(NP)。2001年10月,我们开展了一项前瞻性、多中心、随机、评估者盲法研究,比较阿莫西林-舒巴坦(Ax/S)和阿莫西林-克拉维酸(Ax/C)治疗非复发性AOM(nr-AOM)的疗效。评估了研究儿童(6至48个月,患有nr-AOM)携带的Sp和Hi对Ax/S和Ax/C的抗菌敏感性(AS),以及用高剂量Ax/C(7:1)或Ax/S(4:1)(阿莫西林剂量:80mg/(kg·天),每日两次,共10天)治疗后的临床结果。在第0天采集鼻拭子培养(NCs)样本。仅对Sp携带者进行随访NCs检测。最终分析时,247/289例患者(85.5%)可进行全面评估(120例接受Ax/S治疗,127例接受Ax/C治疗)。第0天Hi和Sp在NP的携带率分别为32.2%(93/289例患者)和28.7%(83/289例患者)。仅在2例患者中检测到持续性Sp携带。Hi的β-内酰胺酶阳性率为13%(12/93)。针对Sp和Hi分离株测试时,Ax/S和Ax/C的最低抑菌浓度(MICs)相同(范围分别为≤0.016 - 1.0和≤0.016 - 0.25mg/L)。Ax/S在第12 - 14天和第28 - 42天的临床疗效分别为98.3%(115/117)和94.2%(97/103);Ax/C分别为98.3%(115/117)和95.1%(98/103)(p无统计学差异)。我们得出结论,从nr-AOM患者的NCs中分离出的Sp和Hi对这两种药物均高度敏感,且与高临床有效率相关。

相似文献

1
Amoxicillin-sulbactam versus amoxicillin-clavulanic acid for the treatment of non-recurrent-acute otitis media in Argentinean children.阿莫西林-舒巴坦与阿莫西林-克拉维酸治疗阿根廷儿童非复发性急性中耳炎的疗效比较
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2005 Sep;69(9):1225-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2005.03.016.
2
Bacterial etiology of acute otitis media and clinical efficacy of amoxicillin-clavulanate versus azithromycin.急性中耳炎的细菌病因及阿莫西林-克拉维酸与阿奇霉素的临床疗效
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2006 May;70(5):915-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2005.10.004. Epub 2005 Nov 15.
3
Effects of amoxicillin/clavulanate or azithromycin on nasopharyngeal carriage of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae in children with acute otitis media.阿莫西林/克拉维酸或阿奇霉素对急性中耳炎患儿肺炎链球菌和流感嗜血杆菌鼻咽部携带情况的影响。
Clin Infect Dis. 2000 Oct;31(4):875-80. doi: 10.1086/318160. Epub 2000 Oct 25.
4
Bacteriologic and clinical efficacy of high dose amoxicillin for therapy of acute otitis media in children.大剂量阿莫西林治疗儿童急性中耳炎的细菌学及临床疗效
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2003 May;22(5):405-13. doi: 10.1097/01.inf.0000065688.21336.fa.
5
Comparative efficacy and safety evaluation of cefaclor vs amoxycillin + clavulanate in children with Acute Otitis Media (AOM).头孢克洛与阿莫西林+克拉维酸治疗儿童急性中耳炎(AOM)的疗效与安全性比较评估
Indian J Pediatr. 2005 Mar;72(3):233-8.
6
A randomized comparative study of levofloxacin versus amoxicillin/clavulanate for treatment of infants and young children with recurrent or persistent acute otitis media.左氧氟沙星与阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗婴幼儿复发性或持续性急性中耳炎的随机对照研究
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2008 Jun;27(6):483-9. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e318168d2cb.
7
Eradication of pathogens from the nasopharynx after therapy of acute maxillary sinusitis with low- or high-dose amoxicillin/clavulanic acid.使用低剂量或高剂量阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗急性上颌窦炎后,从鼻咽部清除病原体。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2005 Nov;26(5):416-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2005.08.012. Epub 2005 Oct 12.
8
The use of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic principles to predict clinical outcome in paediatric acute otitis media.运用药代动力学/药效学原理预测小儿急性中耳炎的临床结局。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2007 Dec;30 Suppl 2:S127-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2007.07.039. Epub 2007 Nov 5.
9
Efficacy of 20- versus 10-day antimicrobial treatment for acute otitis media.20天与10天抗菌治疗对急性中耳炎的疗效比较。
Pediatrics. 1995 Jul;96(1 Pt 1):5-13.
10
Differences in nasopharyngeal bacterial flora in children with nonsevere recurrent acute otitis media and chronic otitis media with effusion: implications for management.非重度复发性急性中耳炎和分泌性中耳炎患儿鼻咽部细菌菌群的差异:对治疗的启示
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2003 Mar;22(3):262-8. doi: 10.1097/01.inf.0000055063.40314.da.