• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左氧氟沙星与阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗婴幼儿复发性或持续性急性中耳炎的随机对照研究

A randomized comparative study of levofloxacin versus amoxicillin/clavulanate for treatment of infants and young children with recurrent or persistent acute otitis media.

作者信息

Noel Gary J, Blumer Jeffrey L, Pichichero Michael E, Hedrick James A, Schwartz Richard H, Balis Dainius A, Melkote Rama, Bagchi Partha, Arguedas Adriano

机构信息

Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C., Raritan, NJ 08869, USA.

出版信息

Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2008 Jun;27(6):483-9. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e318168d2cb.

DOI:10.1097/INF.0b013e318168d2cb
PMID:18449063
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The need for alternative antimicrobial therapy for recurrent and persistent acute otitis media (AOM) in children has raised interest in assessing the efficacy and safety of fluoroquinolones for treatment of these infections.

METHODS

In an evaluator-blinded, active-comparator, noninferiority, multicenter study, children (6 months to <5 years) were randomized 1:1 to receive levofloxacin (10 mg/kg twice daily) or amoxicillin/clavulanate (14:1; amoxicillin 45 mg/kg twice daily) for 10 days, with evaluations 4-6 days of therapy (visit 2), 2-5 days after completing therapy (visit 3), and 10-17 days after last dose (visit 4). Primary outcome was clinical cure at visit 3 based on resolution of clinical signs and symptoms of AOM.

RESULTS

A total of 1650 children were randomized and 1305 were clinically evaluable at visit 3 (630 levofloxacin, 675 comparator). Clinical cure rates were 72.4% (456 of 630) in levofloxacin-treated and 69.9% (472 of 675) in amoxicillin/clavulanate-treated children. Cure rates were also similar for levofloxacin and comparator for each age group (< or =24 months: 68.9% versus 66.2%; >24 months: 76.9% versus 75.1%; respectively). Cure rates at visit 4 were 74.9% and 73.8% in levofloxacin and amoxicillin/clavulanate groups, respectively. The upper limits of the confidence intervals were less than the noninferiority margin of 10% indicating that levofloxacin treatment is noninferior to comparator treatment overall and in both infants (6 months to 2 years) and children 2-5 years. No differences between treatment groups regarding the frequency or type of adverse events were apparent.

CONCLUSIONS

Levofloxacin was not inferior to amoxicillin/clavulanate for the treatment of recurrent and/or persistent AOM in infants and children.

摘要

背景

对于儿童复发性和持续性急性中耳炎(AOM),需要替代抗菌治疗方法,这引发了人们对评估氟喹诺酮类药物治疗这些感染的疗效和安全性的兴趣。

方法

在一项评估者盲法、活性对照、非劣效性、多中心研究中,将6个月至未满5岁的儿童按1:1随机分组,分别接受左氧氟沙星(10mg/kg,每日两次)或阿莫西林/克拉维酸(14:1;阿莫西林45mg/kg,每日两次)治疗10天,并在治疗4 - 6天(访视2)、完成治疗后2 - 5天(访视3)以及最后一剂后10 - 17天(访视4)进行评估。主要结局是基于AOM临床体征和症状的缓解情况在访视3时达到临床治愈。

结果

共有1650名儿童被随机分组,1305名儿童在访视3时可进行临床评估(630名接受左氧氟沙星治疗,675名接受对照治疗)。接受左氧氟沙星治疗的儿童临床治愈率为72.4%(630名中的456名),接受阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗的儿童临床治愈率为69.9%(675名中的472名)。每个年龄组(≤24个月:68.9%对66.2%;>24个月:76.9%对75.1%)左氧氟沙星组和对照组的治愈率也相似。左氧氟沙星组和阿莫西林/克拉维酸组在访视4时的治愈率分别为74.9%和73.8%。置信区间的上限低于10%的非劣效性界值,表明左氧氟沙星治疗总体上以及在婴儿(6个月至2岁)和2 - 5岁儿童中均不劣于对照治疗。治疗组之间在不良事件的频率或类型方面没有明显差异。

结论

在治疗婴幼儿和儿童复发性和/或持续性AOM方面,左氧氟沙星不劣于阿莫西林/克拉维酸。

相似文献

1
A randomized comparative study of levofloxacin versus amoxicillin/clavulanate for treatment of infants and young children with recurrent or persistent acute otitis media.左氧氟沙星与阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗婴幼儿复发性或持续性急性中耳炎的随机对照研究
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2008 Jun;27(6):483-9. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e318168d2cb.
2
Comparative study of levofloxacin in the treatment of children with community-acquired pneumonia.左氧氟沙星治疗儿童社区获得性肺炎的对比研究。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2007 Oct;26(10):868-78. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e3180cbd2c7.
3
Efficacy, tolerability, and parent reported outcomes for cefdinir vs. high-dose amoxicillin/clavulanate oral suspension for acute otitis media in young children.头孢地尼与高剂量阿莫西林/克拉维酸口服混悬液治疗幼儿急性中耳炎的疗效、耐受性及家长报告的结果
Curr Med Res Opin. 2006 Sep;22(9):1839-47. doi: 10.1185/030079906X132406.
4
Bacterial etiology of acute otitis media and clinical efficacy of amoxicillin-clavulanate versus azithromycin.急性中耳炎的细菌病因及阿莫西林-克拉维酸与阿奇霉素的临床疗效
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2006 May;70(5):915-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2005.10.004. Epub 2005 Nov 15.
5
Comparative efficacy and safety evaluation of cefaclor vs amoxycillin + clavulanate in children with Acute Otitis Media (AOM).头孢克洛与阿莫西林+克拉维酸治疗儿童急性中耳炎(AOM)的疗效与安全性比较评估
Indian J Pediatr. 2005 Mar;72(3):233-8.
6
Efficacy of 20- versus 10-day antimicrobial treatment for acute otitis media.20天与10天抗菌治疗对急性中耳炎的疗效比较。
Pediatrics. 1995 Jul;96(1 Pt 1):5-13.
7
An open-label, double tympanocentesis study of levofloxacin therapy in children with, or at high risk for, recurrent or persistent acute otitis media.一项关于左氧氟沙星治疗复发性或持续性急性中耳炎患儿或高危患儿的开放标签、双次鼓膜穿刺研究。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2006 Dec;25(12):1102-9. doi: 10.1097/01.inf.0000246828.13834.f9.
8
A placebo-controlled trial of antimicrobial treatment for acute otitis media.一项抗生素治疗急性中耳炎的安慰剂对照试验。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Jan 13;364(2):116-26. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1007174.
9
Efficacy of cefditoren pivoxil and amoxicillin/clavulanate in the treatment of pediatric patients with acute bacterial rhinosinusitis in Thailand: a randomized, investigator-blinded, controlled trial.头孢妥仑匹酯与阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗泰国儿童急性细菌性鼻-鼻窦炎的疗效:一项随机、研究者设盲的对照试验。
Clin Ther. 2008 Oct;30(10):1870-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.10.001.
10
Amoxicillin-sulbactam versus amoxicillin-clavulanic acid for the treatment of non-recurrent-acute otitis media in Argentinean children.阿莫西林-舒巴坦与阿莫西林-克拉维酸治疗阿根廷儿童非复发性急性中耳炎的疗效比较
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2005 Sep;69(9):1225-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2005.03.016.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety analysis of quinolones use in minors-based on the FAERS database.基于美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库的喹诺酮类药物在未成年人中使用的安全性分析。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Aug 29;11:1437376. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1437376. eCollection 2024.
2
Watchful Waiting in Pediatric Acute Otitis Media: A Real Practice Approach or an Intangible Desideratum?小儿急性中耳炎的静观等待:现实实践方法还是无形的理想?
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Mar 7;59(3):520. doi: 10.3390/medicina59030520.
3
Disproportionality analysis of quinolone safety in children using data from the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS).
利用美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)的数据对儿童喹诺酮类药物安全性进行不成比例性分析。
Front Pediatr. 2023 Jan 11;10:1069504. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.1069504. eCollection 2022.
4
Evaluating Safety Reporting in Paediatric Antibiotic Trials, 2000-2016: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.评估 2000-2016 年儿科抗生素试验中的安全性报告:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Drugs. 2018 Feb;78(2):231-244. doi: 10.1007/s40265-017-0850-x.
5
Safety Concerns Surrounding Quinolone Use in Children.儿童使用喹诺酮类药物的安全性问题
J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Sep;56(9):1060-75. doi: 10.1002/jcph.715. Epub 2016 Mar 28.
6
Prevention of bacterial infection in pediatric oncology: what do we know, what can we learn?儿科肿瘤的细菌感染预防:我们知道什么,我们能学到什么?
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2012 Jul 15;59(1):16-20. doi: 10.1002/pbc.23416. Epub 2011 Nov 18.