Suppr超能文献

合作组试验中拉帕波特分类法与工作分类法的比较:东部肿瘤协作组的经验

A comparison between the Rappaport Classification and Working Formulation in cooperative group trials: the ECOG experience.

作者信息

Neiman R S, Cain K, Ben Arieh Y, Harrington D, Mann R B, Wolf B C

机构信息

Hematopathology Division, Indiana University Medical Center, Indianapolis 46202.

出版信息

Hematol Pathol. 1992;6(2):61-70.

PMID:1607342
Abstract

The Working Formulation (WF) for the classification of non-Hodgkin's lymphomas was shown to be reproducible and clinically relevant in the original study. However, it has not yet been tested by an NCI-supported cooperative clinical oncology group. As a result, the Hematopathology Subcommittee of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) undertook a retrospective study to compare concordance and practical utility between the WF and the Rappaport Classification (RC). Data indicate that with appropriate modifications to minimize unclassifiable lymphomas, the WF can be effectively utilized in cooperative clinical oncology groups.

摘要

非霍奇金淋巴瘤分类的工作方案(WF)在最初的研究中显示出可重复性且与临床相关。然而,它尚未经过美国国立癌症研究所(NCI)支持的合作临床肿瘤学组的检验。因此,东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)血液病理学小组委员会进行了一项回顾性研究,以比较WF与拉帕波特分类法(RC)之间的一致性和实际效用。数据表明,通过适当修改以尽量减少无法分类的淋巴瘤,WF可在合作临床肿瘤学组中得到有效应用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验