Vimpani Graham
Disipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2005 Mar;24(2):111-25. doi: 10.1080/09595230500102210.
Societal responses to the existence of substance misuse fluctuate between harm minimisation and prohibition. Both approaches are predominantly downstream reactions to substance misuse that focus on the supply of harmful substances and the containment of misuse through treatment, rehabilitation or punishment. Until recently, little attention has been paid to the upstream individual, family, relationship, community or societal antecedents of substance misuse (which often overlap with those for other adverse life outcomes, such as unemployment, antisocial personality disorder and mental health problems) that have operated during earlier life. A growing body of evidence highlights the overlapping biological and experiential antecedents for substance abuse and other poor outcomes as well as the trajectory-changing protective factors that can prevent risks being translated into destiny. Risk minimisation and protection enhancement embedded in family and social systems are the essential building blocks of a set of early intervention strategies that begin antenatally and continue through the developing years of childhood, adolescence and young adult life, that have been shown to be effective in improving many outcomes in development, health and well-being. Much remains to be done to enable the promise of effective universal and targeted early intervention to be translated into policies, programs and practices that could be life-changing for citizens bogged in the mire of substance misuse and their children. Realistic, timely investment, influenced by the best scientific evidence indicating what works, for whom, under what circumstances, an increased degree of collaboration within and between governments and their agencies to enable "whole of government" responses in partnership with community-based initiatives are essential along with investments in multidisciplinary program evaluation research that will enable evidence-informed policy decisions to be tailored to the needs of individual countries.
社会对药物滥用现象的应对措施在危害最小化和禁止之间波动。这两种方法主要都是对药物滥用的下游反应,侧重于有害物质的供应以及通过治疗、康复或惩罚来遏制滥用行为。直到最近,人们很少关注药物滥用在个体、家庭、人际关系、社区或社会层面的上游成因(这些成因往往与其他不良生活后果的成因重叠,如失业、反社会人格障碍和心理健康问题),而这些成因在早年就已产生影响。越来越多的证据表明,药物滥用和其他不良后果在生物学和经历方面的成因相互重叠,同时也存在能够改变发展轨迹的保护因素,这些因素可以防止风险转化为既定结果。家庭和社会系统中嵌入的风险最小化和保护增强措施是一系列早期干预策略的基本组成部分,这些策略从产前开始,贯穿儿童、青少年和青年成年期的成长阶段,已被证明在改善发展、健康和福祉等诸多方面的结果方面是有效的。要将有效的普遍和针对性早期干预的前景转化为政策、项目和实践,以使深陷药物滥用困境的公民及其子女的生活发生改变,仍有许多工作要做。基于表明何种措施有效、对谁有效、在何种情况下有效的最佳科学证据进行现实、及时的投资,政府及其机构内部和之间加强合作以实现“政府整体”与基于社区的倡议的伙伴关系应对,以及对多学科项目评估研究的投资至关重要,这些研究将使基于证据的政策决策能够根据各个国家的需求进行调整。