• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项针对教学医院护理人员进行质量管理培训的干预措施评估。

Assessment of an intervention to train teaching hospital care providers in quality management.

作者信息

François P, Vinck D, Labarère J, Reverdy T, Peyrin J-C

机构信息

Qualitique et évaluation médicale Unit, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Grenoble, France.

出版信息

Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Aug;14(4):234-9. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2004.011924.

DOI:10.1136/qshc.2004.011924
PMID:16076785
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1744059/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Successful implementation of continuous quality improvement (CQI) programs in hospitals remains rare in all countries, making it necessary to experiment with implementation methods while considering the cultural factors of resistance to change.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of an educational intervention on involvement of clinical department staff in the quality process.

SETTING

Twelve voluntary clinical departments (six experimental and six controls) in a French 2000-bed university hospital comprising 40 clinical departments.

INTERVENTION

Three day training seminar to a group of 12-20 staff members from each department.

DESIGN

Quasi-experimental post-test only design study with control group conducted 12 months after the intervention with a questionnaire completed in a face-to-face interview.

SUBJECTS

98 trained staff and 100 untrained staff from the six experimental departments and 100 staff from the six control departments.

PRINCIPAL MEASUREMENTS

Declared knowledge of the CQI methods and participation in quality management activities.

RESULTS

286 people (96%) were involved in the study. More of the trained staff knew the CQI methods (62.4%) than staff in the control departments (16.5%) (adjusted odds ratio (ORa) = 10.6 (95% CI 4.97 to 22.62)). More trained staff also participated in quality improvement work groups than control department staff (76.3% v 14.0%; ORa = 27.4 (95% CI 11.6 to 64.4)). In the experimental departments the untrained staff's knowledge of CQI methods and their participation in work groups did not differ from that of control department staff.

CONCLUSIONS

A continuing education intervention can involve care providers in CQI. Dissemination of knowledge from trained personnel to other staff members remains limited.

摘要

背景

在所有国家,医院成功实施持续质量改进(CQI)项目的情况仍然很少见,因此有必要在考虑抵制变革的文化因素的同时试验实施方法。

目的

评估教育干预对临床科室工作人员参与质量改进过程的影响。

地点

一家拥有2000张床位、40个临床科室的法国大学医院中的12个志愿临床科室(6个实验组和6个对照组)。

干预措施

为每个科室的12 - 20名工作人员举办为期三天的培训研讨会。

设计

仅进行后测的准实验设计研究,设立对照组,在干预12个月后通过面对面访谈完成问卷调查。

研究对象

来自6个实验组的98名经过培训的工作人员、100名未经培训的工作人员以及来自6个对照组的100名工作人员。

主要测量指标

对CQI方法的知晓程度以及参与质量管理活动的情况。

结果

286人(96%)参与了研究。与对照组工作人员(16.5%)相比,更多经过培训的工作人员了解CQI方法(62.4%)(调整后的优势比(ORa)= 10.6(95%置信区间4.97至22.62))。与对照组工作人员相比,参与质量改进工作组的经过培训的工作人员也更多(76.3%对14.0%;ORa = 27.4(95%置信区间11.6至64.4))。在实验组中,未经培训的工作人员对CQI方法的了解及其参与工作组的情况与对照组工作人员没有差异。

结论

继续教育干预可使医疗服务提供者参与CQI。从经过培训的人员向其他工作人员传播知识的情况仍然有限。

相似文献

1
Assessment of an intervention to train teaching hospital care providers in quality management.一项针对教学医院护理人员进行质量管理培训的干预措施评估。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Aug;14(4):234-9. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2004.011924.
2
[Implementation of quality management in medical departments of a teaching hospital: accelerators and inhibitors].[教学医院医学科室质量管理的实施:促进因素与抑制因素]
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2008 Jul;56 Suppl 3:S189-95. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2008.04.004. Epub 2008 Jun 6.
3
Quality assessment and improvement: what radiologists do and think.质量评估与改进:放射科医生的工作与思考
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994 Nov;163(5):1245-54. doi: 10.2214/ajr.163.5.7976910.
4
Evaluating implementation of quality management systems in a teaching hospital's clinical departments.评估教学医院临床科室质量管理体系的实施情况。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2003 Feb;15(1):47-55. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/15.1.47.
5
Stop the pain! A nation-wide quality improvement programme in paediatric oncology pain control.止住疼痛!一项全国性的儿童肿瘤疼痛控制质量改进计划。
Eur J Pain. 2008 Oct;12(7):819-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2007.12.002. Epub 2008 Jan 25.
6
Continuous quality improvement and physician training.持续质量改进与医师培训。
Qual Manag Health Care. 1992 Fall;1(1):13-9.
7
[A proposal for reforming psychologists' training in France and in the European Union].[关于法国及欧盟心理学家培训改革的一项提议]
Encephale. 2009 Feb;35(1):18-24. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2007.11.008. Epub 2008 Apr 2.
8
Six Sigma: not for the faint of heart.六西格玛:并非胆小者所能驾驭。
Radiol Manage. 2003 Mar-Apr;25(2):40-53.
9
Cultivating quality. CQI helps a system's members provide efficient, effective care to their clients.培养质量。持续质量改进有助于系统成员为其客户提供高效、有效的护理。
Health Prog. 1992 Mar;73(2):42-8.
10
Department deployment: integrating quality improvement into day-to-day management.部门部署:将质量改进融入日常管理
Qual Lett Healthc Lead. 1994 Jul-Aug;6(6):31-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of Labor Practices in Healthcare Using an Innovatory Framework for Sustainability.利用可持续性创新框架评估医疗保健中的劳动实践。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Apr 19;59(4):796. doi: 10.3390/medicina59040796.
2
An Innovative Framework for Sustainable Development in Healthcare: The Human Rights Assessment.医疗保健可持续发展的创新框架:人权评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 16;19(4):2222. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042222.
3
Total quality management in the health-care context: integrating the literature and directing future research.医疗保健领域的全面质量管理:整合文献并指导未来研究。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2019 Sep 23;12:167-177. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S197038. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Implementing culture change in health care: theory and practice.在医疗保健领域实施文化变革:理论与实践
Int J Qual Health Care. 2003 Apr;15(2):111-8. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzg021.
2
Evaluating implementation of quality management systems in a teaching hospital's clinical departments.评估教学医院临床科室质量管理体系的实施情况。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2003 Feb;15(1):47-55. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/15.1.47.
3
Assessing the factors influencing continuous quality improvement implementation: experience in Korean hospitals.评估影响持续质量改进实施的因素:韩国医院的经验
Int J Qual Health Care. 2002 Oct;14(5):383-91. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/14.5.383.
4
Health care quality and how to achieve it.医疗保健质量及其实现方式。
Acad Med. 2002 Jan;77(1):91-9. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200201000-00021.
5
Evaluation of a program to improve the prescription-writing quality in hospital.一项提高医院处方书写质量项目的评估
Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv. 2001;14(6-7):268-74. doi: 10.1108/09526860110404248.
6
Organizational culture, continuous quality improvement, and medication administration error reporting.组织文化、持续质量改进与用药差错报告
Am J Med Qual. 2001 Jul-Aug;16(4):128-34. doi: 10.1177/106286060101600404.
7
Development of a French inpatient satisfaction questionnaire.一份法国住院患者满意度调查问卷的编制
Int J Qual Health Care. 2001 Apr;13(2):99-108. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/13.2.99.
8
Workforce cultural factors in TQM/CQI implementation in hospitals.医院全面质量管理/持续质量改进实施中的劳动力文化因素。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2000 Summer;25(3):80-93. doi: 10.1097/00004010-200007000-00009.
9
Effecting and leading change in health care organizations.在医疗保健组织中推动和引领变革。
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2000 Jul;26(7):388-99. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(00)26032-x.
10
Commentary: why quality improvement efforts in health care fail and what can be done about it.评论:医疗保健领域质量改进努力为何失败以及如何应对。
Am J Med Qual. 2000 Mar-Apr;15(2):49-53. doi: 10.1177/106286060001500202.