Vlaskamp Björn N S, Over Eelco A B, Hooge Ignace Th C
Psychonomics Department, Helmholtz Institute, Universiteit Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 2, The Netherlands.
Exp Brain Res. 2005 Nov;167(2):246-59. doi: 10.1007/s00221-005-0032-z. Epub 2005 Nov 15.
In a saccadic search task, we investigated whether spacing between elements affects search performance. Since it has been suggested in the literature that element spacing can affect the eye movement strategy in several ways, its effects on search time per element are hard to predict. In the first experiment, we varied the element spacing (3.4 degrees -7.1 degrees distance between elements) and target-distracter similarity. As expected, search time per element increased with target-distracter similarity. Decreasing element spacing decreased the search time per element. However, this effect was surprisingly small in comparison to the effect of varying target-distracter similarity. In a second experiment, we elaborated on this finding and decreased element spacing even further (between 0.8 degrees and 3.2 degrees). Here, we did not find an effect on search time per element for element spacings from 3.2 degrees to spacings as small as 1.5 degrees . It was only at distances smaller than 1.5 degrees that search time per element increased with decreasing element spacing. In order to explain the remarkable finding that search time per element was not affected for such a wide range of element spacings, we propose that irrespective of the spacing crowding kept the number of elements processed per fixation more or less constant.
在一个扫视搜索任务中,我们研究了元素之间的间距是否会影响搜索性能。由于文献中已表明元素间距可以通过多种方式影响眼动策略,所以其对每个元素搜索时间的影响很难预测。在第一个实验中,我们改变了元素间距(元素之间的距离为3.4度至7.1度)以及目标-干扰项的相似度。正如预期的那样,每个元素的搜索时间随着目标-干扰项相似度的增加而增加。减小元素间距会减少每个元素的搜索时间。然而,与改变目标-干扰项相似度的影响相比,这种效果出奇地小。在第二个实验中,我们详细研究了这一发现,并进一步减小了元素间距(在0.8度至3.2度之间)。在这里,对于从3.2度到小至1.5度的元素间距,我们没有发现其对每个元素搜索时间有影响。只有在距离小于1.5度时,每个元素的搜索时间才会随着元素间距的减小而增加。为了解释这一显著发现,即对于如此广泛的元素间距范围,每个元素的搜索时间都没有受到影响,我们提出,无论间距如何,拥挤效应使每次注视所处理的元素数量或多或少保持恒定。