Quiñones-Hinojosa Alfredo, Sanai Nader, Smith Justin S, McDermott Michael W
Department of Neurological Surgery, and Brain Tumor Research Center, University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Avenue, Moffitt Hospital Room M779, Box 0112, San Francisco, CA 94143-0112, USA.
J Neurooncol. 2005 Aug;74(1):19-30. doi: 10.1007/s11060-004-5758-0.
Assessment of brain tumor proliferative potential provides important prognostic information that supplements standard histopathologic grading. Many laboratories rely on mitotic figures to quantify the proliferative potential of brain tumors, but this conventional cellular proliferative index is subject to inter-observer variability and not consistently predictive for low-and high-grade tumors. Recent advancements in technology have made it possible to use proliferative indices as a standard supplement in pathology laboratories. Non-invasive tumor tissue measurements of cell proliferation can be performed using- bromodeoxyuridine labeling index (BrdU LI), flow cytometry (FCM), MIB-1 antibody to the Ki-67 antigen (MIB-1), proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), and argyrophilic nucleolar organizing regions (AgNOR). Each of these assays has been described in the literature with respect to its ability to predict tumor grade or outcome. At the present time MIB-1 and AgNOR are the simplest and most reliable of these techniques. In addition, advances in our understanding of the genetic alterations associated with proliferation promise to provide more specific markers of proliferative potential. Beyond the pathology laboratory, radiographic studies such as positron emission tomography (PET), single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), and most recently magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) have been used as follow-up measures, assessing response to treatment and tumor recurrence, rather than as predictors of response to treatment. These radiographic tools, however, have the potential to provide an assessment of tumor proliferation without the need for invasive measures. In this article, we present a review of the current techniques utilized to understand the proliferative potential of brain tumors.
评估脑肿瘤的增殖潜能可提供重要的预后信息,作为对标准组织病理学分级的补充。许多实验室依靠有丝分裂象来量化脑肿瘤的增殖潜能,但这种传统的细胞增殖指数存在观察者间差异,对低级别和高级别肿瘤的预测也并不一致。技术上的最新进展使得在病理实验室将增殖指数作为标准补充成为可能。可使用溴脱氧尿苷标记指数(BrdU LI)、流式细胞术(FCM)、针对Ki-67抗原的MIB-1抗体(MIB-1)、增殖细胞核抗原(PCNA)以及嗜银核仁组织区(AgNOR)对肿瘤组织进行非侵入性细胞增殖测量。关于这些检测方法预测肿瘤分级或预后的能力,每一种都在文献中有所描述。目前,MIB-1和AgNOR是这些技术中最简单且最可靠的。此外,我们对与增殖相关的基因改变的理解取得的进展有望提供更具特异性的增殖潜能标志物。在病理实验室之外,正电子发射断层扫描(PET)、单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)以及最近的磁共振波谱(MRS)等影像学研究已被用作随访手段,用于评估治疗反应和肿瘤复发,而非作为治疗反应的预测指标。然而,这些影像学工具有可能在无需侵入性检测的情况下对肿瘤增殖进行评估。在本文中,我们对目前用于了解脑肿瘤增殖潜能的技术进行综述。