Sarangmath Nagaraja, Rattihalli Rohini, Ragothaman Mona, Gopalkrishna Gururaj, Doddaballapur Subbakrishna, Louis Elan D, Muthane Uday B
Department of Neurology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India.
Mov Disord. 2005 Dec;20(12):1550-6. doi: 10.1002/mds.20576.
The prevalence of Parkinson's disease (PD) is low among Indians, except in the Parsis. Data for Indians come from studies using different screening tools and criteria to detect PD. An epidemiological study in India, which has nearly a billion people, more than 18 spoken languages, and varying levels of literacy, requires development and validation of a screening tool for PD. The objectives of this study are to (1) validate a modified version of a widely used screening questionnaire for PD to suit the needs of the Indian population; (2) compare the use of a nonmedical assistant (NMA) with the use of a medical person during screening; and (3) compare the effect of literacy of participants on the validity of the screening tool. The validity of the questionnaire was tested on 125 participants from a home for the elderly. NMAs of similar background and medical personnel administered the modified screening questionnaire. A movement disorder neurologist blind to the responses on the questionnaire, examined participants independently and diagnosed if participants had PD. The questionnaire was validated in the movement disorders clinic, on known PD patients and their family members without PD. In the movement disorders clinic, sensitivity and specificity of the questionnaire were 100% and 89%, respectively. Fifty-seven participants were included for analysis. The questionnaire had a higher sensitivity when NMAs (75%) rather than the medical personnel (61%) administered it, and its specificity was higher with the medical personnel (61%) than with NMAs (55% and 25%). The questionnaire had a higher specificity in literates than illiterates, whereas sensitivity varied considerably. The modified questionnaire translated in a local Indian language had reasonable sensitivity and can be used to screen individuals for PD in epidemiological studies in India. This questionnaire can be administered by NMAs to screen PD and this strategy would reduce manpower costs. Literacy may influence epidemiological estimates when screening PD.
帕金森病(PD)在印度人中的患病率较低,除了帕西人。印度人的数据来自使用不同筛查工具和标准来检测帕金森病的研究。在印度这样一个拥有近十亿人口、超过18种口语语言以及不同识字水平的国家进行一项流行病学研究,需要开发和验证一种针对帕金森病的筛查工具。本研究的目的是:(1)验证一种广泛使用的帕金森病筛查问卷的修改版本,以满足印度人群的需求;(2)比较在筛查过程中使用非医疗助手(NMA)和医疗人员的情况;(3)比较参与者的识字水平对筛查工具有效性的影响。该问卷在一家养老院的125名参与者身上进行了有效性测试。背景相似的非医疗助手和医疗人员发放了修改后的筛查问卷。一名对问卷回答不知情的运动障碍神经科医生独立检查参与者,并诊断其是否患有帕金森病。该问卷在运动障碍诊所对已知的帕金森病患者及其无帕金森病的家庭成员进行了验证。在运动障碍诊所,问卷的敏感性和特异性分别为100%和89%。纳入57名参与者进行分析。当由非医疗助手(75%)而非医疗人员(61%)发放问卷时,问卷具有更高的敏感性,而医疗人员发放时问卷的特异性(61%)高于非医疗助手(55%和25%)。问卷在识字者中的特异性高于文盲,而敏感性差异较大。翻译成印度当地语言的修改后问卷具有合理的敏感性,可用于印度流行病学研究中对个体进行帕金森病筛查。该问卷可由非医疗助手发放以筛查帕金森病,这种策略将降低人力成本。在筛查帕金森病时,识字水平可能会影响流行病学估计。