Needham Larry L, Ozkaynak Halûk, Whyatt Robin M, Barr Dana B, Wang Richard Y, Naeher Luke, Akland Gerry, Bahadori Tina, Bradman Asa, Fortmann Roy, Liu L-J Sally, Morandi Maria, O'Rourke Mary Kay, Thomas Kent, Quackenboss James, Ryan P Barry, Zartarian Valerie
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Environ Health Perspect. 2005 Aug;113(8):1076-82. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7613.
The science of exposure assessment is relatively new and evolving rapidly with the advancement of sophisticated methods for specific measurements at the picogram per gram level or lower in a variety of environmental and biologic matrices. Without this measurement capability, environmental health studies rely on questionnaires or other indirect means as the primary method to assess individual exposures. Although we use indirect methods, they are seldom used as stand-alone tools. Analyses of environmental and biologic samples have allowed us to get more precise data on exposure pathways, from sources to concentrations, to routes, to exposure, to doses. They also often allow a better estimation of the absorbed dose and its relation to potential adverse health outcomes in individuals and in populations. Here, we make note of various environmental agents and how best to assess exposure to them in the National Children's Study--a longitudinal epidemiologic study of children's health. Criteria for the analytical method of choice are discussed with particular emphasis on the need for long-term quality control and quality assurance measures.
暴露评估科学相对较新,且随着用于在各种环境和生物基质中进行皮克每克水平或更低水平的特定测量的复杂方法的进步而迅速发展。没有这种测量能力,环境卫生研究就依赖问卷或其他间接手段作为评估个体暴露的主要方法。虽然我们使用间接方法,但它们很少被用作独立工具。对环境和生物样本的分析使我们能够获得关于暴露途径的更精确数据,从来源到浓度,到途径,到暴露,再到剂量。它们还常常能更好地估计吸收剂量及其与个体和人群中潜在不良健康结果的关系。在此,我们提及各种环境因素以及在国家儿童研究(一项关于儿童健康的纵向流行病学研究)中如何最好地评估对这些因素的暴露。讨论了选择分析方法的标准,特别强调了长期质量控制和质量保证措施的必要性。