Busch Michael P, Caglioti Sally, Robertson Eugene F, McAuley Joan D, Tobler Leslie H, Kamel Hany, Linnen Jeffrey M, Shyamala Venkatakrishna, Tomasulo Peter, Kleinman Steven H
Blood Systems Research Institute, San Francisco, USA.
N Engl J Med. 2005 Aug 4;353(5):460-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa044029.
The use of nucleic acid amplification tests of "minipools" of 16 samples to screen blood donors for West Nile virus RNA began in July 2003. We report the yield and characteristics of positive donations and the incremental yield and safety of nucleic acid amplification tests of individual donations.
Reactive minipools were analyzed to identify the individual reactive donations. For the regions with the highest yield on minipool testing, retrospective nucleic acid amplification testing was performed on individual donations that were negative on minipool testing. Reactive donations were confirmed by alternative nucleic acid amplification tests and IgM and IgG tests, and donors were followed to document seroconversion.
From July 1 through October 31, 2003, 677,603 donations were prospectively screened for West Nile virus by minipool testing, yielding 183 confirmed viremic donations (0.027 percent, or 1 in 3703 donations). Retrospective individual testing of 23,088 donations from high-prevalence regions that were negative on minipool testing yielded 30 additional units with a low level of viremia, with 14 additional viremic units detected by prospective testing of individual donations late in the 2003 transmission season. Of all the viremic units detected, 5 percent were detected only by individual testing and were negative for IgM antibody, 29 percent were detected by individual testing after IgM seroconversion, and 66 percent were detected by minipool testing. West Nile virus infection was confirmed in both recipients of IgM-negative units that were reactive on individual testing, whereas neither recipient of antibody-positive blood components that were reactive on individual testing was infected. In 2004, prospective testing of individual donations in regions that yielded donations that were reactive on minipool testing resulted in a 32 percent incremental yield of units with a low level of viremia that would have been missed by minipool testing.
Although nucleic acid amplification testing of minipools of blood donations prevented hundreds of cases of West Nile virus infection in 2003, it failed to detect units with a low level of viremia, some of which were antibody-negative and infectious. These data support the use of targeted nucleic acid amplification testing of individual donations in high-prevalence regions, a strategy that was implemented successfully in 2004.
2003年7月开始采用对16个样本的“微池”进行核酸扩增检测来筛查献血者的西尼罗河病毒RNA。我们报告了阳性献血的检出率及特征,以及对单个献血进行核酸扩增检测的增量检出率和安全性。
对反应性微池进行分析以确定单个反应性献血。对于微池检测中检出率最高的地区,对微池检测呈阴性的单个献血进行回顾性核酸扩增检测。通过替代核酸扩增检测以及IgM和IgG检测确认反应性献血,并对献血者进行随访以记录血清学转换情况。
2003年7月1日至10月31日,通过微池检测对677,603份献血进行了前瞻性西尼罗河病毒筛查,检出183份确诊病毒血症献血(0.027%,即每3703份献血中有1份)。对来自高流行地区的23,088份微池检测呈阴性的献血进行回顾性个体检测,又检出30份病毒血症水平较低的单位,在2003年传播季节后期对单个献血进行前瞻性检测又发现14份病毒血症单位。在所有检出的病毒血症单位中,5%仅通过个体检测检出且IgM抗体呈阴性,29%在IgM血清学转换后通过个体检测检出,66%通过微池检测检出。对个体检测呈反应性但IgM阴性的单位的两名受血者均确诊感染西尼罗河病毒,而对个体检测呈反应性的抗体阳性血液成分的受血者均未感染。2004年,在微池检测呈反应性的献血地区对单个献血进行前瞻性检测,使微池检测漏检的病毒血症水平较低的单位的增量检出率提高了32%。
虽然2003年对献血微池进行核酸扩增检测预防了数百例西尼罗河病毒感染,但未能检测出病毒血症水平较低的单位,其中一些单位抗体呈阴性且具有传染性。这些数据支持在高流行地区对单个献血进行靶向核酸扩增检测,这一策略于2004年成功实施。