Turcotte Leo, Robst John, Polachek Solomon
Department of Economics and Finance, West Chester University, West Chester, PA, 19383,
Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2005 Sep;5(3):255-71. doi: 10.1007/s10754-005-1789-0.
This paper extends prior research on the effect of Medicaid coverage on medical interventions during pregnancy (prenatal ultrasound) and birth (ultrasound during delivery, cesarean delivery, inducement, and fetal monitor). The data are from two sources: the New York State Vital Statistics (VS) matched infant birth-death file and the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) file for 1993--1996. Medicaid coverage increases the likelihood of teens and adults receiving prenatal care relative to being uninsured. Overall, the effect of insurance type varies depending on whether the procedure is part of standard care (ultrasound and fetal monitor) or more likely to be elective (inducement and cesarean delivery). Insurance type has a greater effect for elective procedures than for procedures that are part of standard care.
本文扩展了先前关于医疗补助覆盖范围对孕期医疗干预措施(产前超声检查)及分娩期医疗干预措施(分娩时超声检查、剖宫产、引产及胎儿监护)影响的研究。数据来源于两个渠道:纽约州生命统计(VS)匹配的婴儿出生-死亡档案以及1993 - 1996年的全州规划与研究合作系统(SPARCS)档案。相对于未参保而言,医疗补助覆盖范围增加了青少年和成年人接受产前护理的可能性。总体而言,保险类型的影响因该程序是标准护理的一部分(超声检查和胎儿监护)还是更有可能为选择性程序(引产和剖宫产)而有所不同。保险类型对选择性程序的影响比对作为标准护理一部分的程序的影响更大。