Bylund Carma L, Makoul Gregory
Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA.
Health Commun. 2005;18(2):123-40. doi: 10.1207/s15327027hc1802_2.
Educators, researchers, clinicians, and patients often advocate empathy in the physician-patient relationship. However, little research has systematically examined how patients present opportunities for physicians to communicate empathically and how physicians respond to such opportunities. The Empathic Communication Coding System was used to investigate empathic opportunity-response sequences during initial visits in a general internal medicine clinic. This study focuses on 100 visits during which patients created at least 1 explicit empathic opportunity. Overall, patients presented 249 empathic opportunities in these 100 visits; physicians most often responded by acknowledging, pursuing, or confirming the patient's statement. The mean length of empathic opportunity-response sequences was 25.8 sec; sequences tended to be longer in duration when the physician used a more empathic response. Positively valenced empathic opportunities generated a more empathic response than did negatively valenced empathic opportunities. However, there was no relation between the emotional intensity of empathic opportunities and the level of empathy in subsequent physician responses. Further research should examine patient preferences and outcomes associated with varying levels of empathic responses.
教育工作者、研究人员、临床医生和患者常常倡导在医患关系中体现同理心。然而,很少有研究系统地考察患者如何为医生提供进行同理心沟通的机会,以及医生如何回应这些机会。共情沟通编码系统被用于调查普通内科门诊初诊期间的共情机会 - 反应序列。本研究聚焦于100次就诊,在此期间患者创造了至少1个明确的共情机会。总体而言,患者在这100次就诊中提供了249个共情机会;医生最常通过认可、追问或确认患者的陈述来做出回应。共情机会 - 反应序列的平均时长为25.8秒;当医生使用更具同理心的回应时,序列的持续时间往往更长。积极情绪的共情机会比消极情绪的共情机会引发了更具同理心的回应。然而,共情机会的情感强度与医生后续回应中的同理心水平之间没有关联。进一步的研究应考察与不同程度的共情回应相关的患者偏好和结果。