Nakling Jakob, Buhaug Harald, Backe Bjorn
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Central Hospital of Lillehammer, Norway.
Early Hum Dev. 2005 Oct;81(10):833-9. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2005.06.004. Epub 2005 Aug 9.
In a large unselected population of normal spontaneous pregnancies, to estimate the biologic variation of the interval from the first day of the last menstrual period to start of pregnancy, and the biologic variation of gestational length to delivery; and to estimate the random error of routine ultrasound assessment of gestational age in mid-second trimester.
Cohort study of 11,238 singleton pregnancies, with spontaneous onset of labour and reliable last menstrual period. The day of delivery was predicted with two independent methods: According to the rule of Nägele and based on ultrasound examination in gestational weeks 17-19. For both methods, the mean difference between observed and predicted day of delivery was calculated. The variances of the differences were combined to estimate the variances of the two partitions of pregnancy.
The biologic variation of the time from last menstrual period to pregnancy start was estimated to 7.0 days (standard deviation), and the standard deviation of the time to spontaneous delivery was estimated to 12.4 days. The estimate of the standard deviation of the random error of ultrasound assessed foetal age was 5.2 days.
Even when the last menstrual period is reliable, the biologic variation of the time from last menstrual period to the real start of pregnancy is substantial, and must be taken into account. Reliable information about the first day of the last menstrual period is not equivalent with reliable information about the start of pregnancy.
在一大群未经选择的正常自然妊娠人群中,估计从末次月经第一天到妊娠开始的间隔时间的生物学变异,以及妊娠时长至分娩的生物学变异;并估计孕中期常规超声评估胎龄的随机误差。
对11238例单胎妊娠进行队列研究,这些妊娠自然发动分娩且末次月经日期可靠。采用两种独立方法预测分娩日期:根据奈格莱法则以及基于孕17 - 19周的超声检查。对于这两种方法,计算观察到的和预测的分娩日期之间的平均差异。将差异的方差合并以估计妊娠两个阶段的方差。
从末次月经到妊娠开始的时间的生物学变异估计为7.0天(标准差),自然分娩时间的标准差估计为12.4天。超声评估胎儿年龄的随机误差的标准差估计为5.2天。
即使末次月经日期可靠,从末次月经到实际妊娠开始的时间的生物学变异仍然很大,必须予以考虑。关于末次月经第一天的可靠信息并不等同于关于妊娠开始的可靠信息。