Rossavik I K, Fishburne J I
University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City.
Obstet Gynecol. 1989 Feb;73(2):243-9.
Ultrasound dating-curve analysis was performed for the biparietal diameter, mean head diameter, and mean trunk diameter in individual singletons, twins, and triplets from in vitro fertilization (IVF) pregnancies and pregnancies with ultrasonographic determination of ovulation. Linear growth was found for all parameters prior to 28 weeks' conceptional age. No differences were observed among singletons, twins, or triplets. Using linear equations, no significant difference was found in systematic errors between pregnancies with a known date of conception and pregnancies dated from the last menstrual period (LMP). Pregnancies with reliable LMPs had only a slight and nonsignificant increase in random errors when compared with pregnancies from IVF. Current polynomial dating equations produced considerable systematic and random errors as well as errors related to fetal growth. Acceptable results were obtained with a new linear equation based on two examinations. We conclude that gestational age based on good menstrual records supported by a pelvic examination in the first trimester may be more reliable than even the best ultrasound method for dating.
对体外受精(IVF)妊娠以及通过超声确定排卵的妊娠中,单胎、双胎和三胎个体的双顶径、平均头径和平均躯干径进行了超声孕周曲线分析。在孕龄28周之前,所有参数均呈线性生长。单胎、双胎或三胎之间未观察到差异。使用线性方程,已知受孕日期的妊娠与根据末次月经日期(LMP)确定孕周的妊娠之间,系统误差无显著差异。与IVF妊娠相比,LMP可靠的妊娠随机误差仅略有增加且无显著意义。当前的多项式孕周方程产生了相当大的系统误差和随机误差以及与胎儿生长相关的误差。基于两次检查的新线性方程获得了可接受的结果。我们得出结论,基于孕早期盆腔检查支持的良好月经记录确定的孕周,可能比即使是最好的超声测孕方法更可靠。