• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

氯沙坦与卡托普利对心力衰竭相关结局及症状的比较:来自氯沙坦心力衰竭生存研究(ELITE II)

Comparison of losartan and captopril on heart failure-related outcomes and symptoms from the losartan heart failure survival study (ELITE II).

作者信息

Konstam Marvin A, Neaton James D, Poole-Wilson Philip A, Pitt Bertram, Segal Robert, Sharma Divakar, Dasbach Erik J, Carides George W, Dickstein Kenneth, Riegger Günter, Camm A John, Martinez Felipe A, Bradstreet Deborah C, Ikeda Leila S, Santoro Emanuela P

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Tufts-New England Medical Center, Boston, MA 02111, USA.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2005 Jul;150(1):123-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.10.035.

DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2004.10.035
PMID:16084158
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Blockade of the renin-angiotensin system with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors improves outcomes and symptoms in patients with heart failure (HF). We compared effects of losartan to captopril on mortality, morbidity, and functional status for patients in the ELITE II study.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 3152 patients, aged 60 years or older, with New York Heart Association (NYHA) classes II to IV HF and ejection fraction < or = 40% were assigned to receive losartan 50 mg once daily or captopril 50 mg 3 times daily. Outcome measures included all-cause and HF-related mortality, hospitalizations, and discontinuations; change in NYHA class; and quality of life (QoL). HF-related outcomes were not significantly different between therapies. Similar improvements from baseline (P < .01) in NYHA class were observed within both treatment groups. Among 1856 QoL participants, 1343 patients survived at least 1 year; the QoL for 1-year survivors improved in both treatment groups (P < .001 vs baseline) and did not differ between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In ELITE II, the effects of losartan on HF-related outcomes, NYHA class, and QoL were not superior to those of captopril. Although angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors remain the treatment of choice for patients with HF, the similarity of the findings in the present analysis supports a role for angiotensin-receptor antagonists in this patient population.

摘要

背景

使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂阻断肾素-血管紧张素系统可改善心力衰竭(HF)患者的预后和症状。在ELITE II研究中,我们比较了氯沙坦与卡托普利对患者死亡率、发病率和功能状态的影响。

方法与结果

共有3152例年龄在60岁及以上、纽约心脏协会(NYHA)心功能II至IV级且射血分数≤40%的HF患者,被分配接受每日一次50mg氯沙坦或每日三次50mg卡托普利治疗。观察指标包括全因死亡率、与HF相关的死亡率、住院率、停药率;NYHA心功能分级的变化;以及生活质量(QoL)。两种治疗方法在与HF相关的预后方面无显著差异。两个治疗组内均观察到NYHA心功能分级较基线有相似的改善(P<.01)。在1856例参与QoL评估的患者中,1343例患者存活至少1年;两个治疗组中1年存活者的QoL均有所改善(与基线相比P<.001),且两组间无差异。

结论

在ELITE II研究中,氯沙坦在与HF相关的预后、NYHA心功能分级和QoL方面的效果并不优于卡托普利。虽然血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂仍然是HF患者的首选治疗药物,但本分析结果的相似性支持血管紧张素受体拮抗剂在该患者群体中的作用。

相似文献

1
Comparison of losartan and captopril on heart failure-related outcomes and symptoms from the losartan heart failure survival study (ELITE II).氯沙坦与卡托普利对心力衰竭相关结局及症状的比较:来自氯沙坦心力衰竭生存研究(ELITE II)
Am Heart J. 2005 Jul;150(1):123-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.10.035.
2
Angiotensin II receptor antagonists and heart failure: angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors remain the first-line option.血管紧张素II受体拮抗剂与心力衰竭:血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂仍是一线选择。
Prescrire Int. 2005 Oct;14(79):180-6.
3
Erythropoietin levels in heart failure after an acute myocardial infarction: determinants, prognostic value, and the effects of captopril versus losartan.急性心肌梗死后心力衰竭患者的促红细胞生成素水平:决定因素、预后价值以及卡托普利与氯沙坦的作用比较
Am Heart J. 2009 Jan;157(1):91-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.08.020. Epub 2008 Oct 28.
4
[Effect of long-term treatment with enalapril, losartan and their combination on the quality of life of patients with congestive heart failure].[依那普利、氯沙坦及其联合用药长期治疗对充血性心力衰竭患者生活质量的影响]
Ter Arkh. 2002;74(1):52-5.
5
Effects of losartan and captopril on left ventricular systolic and diastolic function after acute myocardial infarction: results of the Optimal Trial in Myocardial Infarction with Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan (OPTIMAAL) echocardiographic substudy.氯沙坦与卡托普利对急性心肌梗死后左心室收缩和舒张功能的影响:氯沙坦治疗心肌梗死的最佳试验(OPTIMAAL)超声心动图亚研究结果
Am Heart J. 2004 Mar;147(3):494-501. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2003.10.031.
6
Randomised trial of losartan versus captopril in patients over 65 with heart failure (Evaluation of Losartan in the Elderly Study, ELITE).氯沙坦与卡托普利治疗65岁以上心力衰竭患者的随机试验(老年氯沙坦评估研究,ELITE)
Lancet. 1997 Mar 15;349(9054):747-52. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(97)01187-2.
7
Effects of losartan versus captopril on mortality in patients with symptomatic heart failure: rationale, design, and baseline characteristics of patients in the Losartan Heart Failure Survival Study--ELITE II.氯沙坦与卡托普利对有症状心力衰竭患者死亡率的影响:氯沙坦心力衰竭生存研究(ELITE II)中患者的理论依据、设计及基线特征
J Card Fail. 1999 Jun;5(2):146-54. doi: 10.1016/s1071-9164(99)90037-4.
8
Proteinuria, chronic kidney disease, and the effect of an angiotensin receptor blocker in addition to an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor in patients with moderate to severe heart failure.蛋白尿、慢性肾病以及血管紧张素受体阻滞剂联合血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂对中重度心力衰竭患者的影响
Circulation. 2009 Oct 20;120(16):1577-84. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.853648. Epub 2009 Oct 5.
9
Effect of losartan compared with captopril on mortality in patients with symptomatic heart failure: randomised trial--the Losartan Heart Failure Survival Study ELITE II.氯沙坦与卡托普利对有症状心力衰竭患者死亡率影响的比较:随机试验——氯沙坦心力衰竭生存研究(ELITE II)
Lancet. 2000 May 6;355(9215):1582-7. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02213-3.
10
[ELITE II. AT1-blockers not better, but more tolerable than ACE-inhibitors].[ELITE II研究:血管紧张素II受体拮抗剂不比血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂好,但耐受性更佳]
Internist (Berl). 2000 Jan;41(1):A37.

引用本文的文献

1
Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition improves cerebrovascular control during exercise in male rats with heart failure.血管紧张素转换酶抑制改善心力衰竭雄性大鼠运动期间的脑血管控制。
Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2021 Apr;286:103613. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2020.103613. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
2
Pharmacological interventions for heart failure in people with chronic kidney disease.慢性肾脏病患者心力衰竭的药物干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Feb 27;2(2):CD012466. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012466.pub2.
3
Recommendations for cardiomyopathy surveillance for survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group.
儿童癌症幸存者心肌病监测建议:国际儿童癌症长期效应指南协调小组报告
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Mar;16(3):e123-36. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70409-7.
4
Is there benefit in optimising heart failure treatment in over-80 year-old patients? (HF-80 study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.是否有必要优化 80 岁以上心力衰竭患者的治疗?(HF-80 研究):一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2012 Mar 6;13:25. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-25.
5
Relationships between changes in patient-reported health status and functional capacity in outpatients with heart failure.心力衰竭门诊患者报告的健康状况和功能能力变化之间的关系。
Am Heart J. 2012 Jan;163(1):88-94.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.09.027.
6
Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade for cardiovascular diseases: current status.肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统阻断用于心血管疾病:现状
Br J Pharmacol. 2010 Jul;160(6):1273-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.00750.x.
7
Comparing angiotensin II receptor blockers on benefits beyond blood pressure.比较血管紧张素Ⅱ受体阻滞剂在降压之外的获益。
Adv Ther. 2010 May;27(5):257-84. doi: 10.1007/s12325-010-0028-3. Epub 2010 Jun 3.
8
Outcomes, health policy, and managed care: relationships between patient-reported outcome measures and clinical measures in outpatients with heart failure.结果、卫生政策与管理式医疗:心力衰竭门诊患者自我报告的结局指标与临床指标之间的关系
Am Heart J. 2009 Oct;158(4 Suppl):S64-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.07.010.
9
Role of angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists in the treatment of hypertension in patients aged >or=65 years.血管紧张素II 1型受体拮抗剂在65岁及以上高血压患者治疗中的作用
Drugs Aging. 2009;26(9):751-67. doi: 10.2165/11316790-000000000-00000.
10
Effects of prolonged angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor treatment on amyloid beta-protein metabolism in mouse models of Alzheimer disease.长期使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂治疗对阿尔茨海默病小鼠模型中β-淀粉样蛋白代谢的影响。
Neurobiol Dis. 2007 Apr;26(1):273-81. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2007.01.004. Epub 2007 Jan 25.