• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过支持性的处方限制消除镇痛剂哌替啶的使用。

Eliminating analgesic meperidine use with a supported formulary restriction.

作者信息

O'Connor Alec B, Lang Valerie J, Quill Timothy E

机构信息

University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.

出版信息

Am J Med. 2005 Aug;118(8):885-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.01.061.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.01.061
PMID:16084182
Abstract

PURPOSE

Meperidine is a commonly used analgesic despite unique disadvantages compared with other opioid analgesics. The objective of this study was to measure the effects of a meperidine formulary restriction on the prescribing of parenteral opioid analgesics.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was performed at a single 750-bed tertiary care teaching hospital in Rochester, NY. The formulary restriction limited meperidine to use exclusively for rigors or procedural sedation and was supported by an educational initiative and a computerized order entry system. Independent computerized pharmacy records were used to capture all doses of parenteral morphine, meperidine, and hydromorphone administered to patients in the emergency department or on a medical or surgical inpatient floor during data-collection periods. Baseline data were collected during two 3-day periods before the formulary restriction; then comparison data were collected during three 3-day periods over 15 months after the formulary restriction.

RESULTS

The number of administered doses of meperidine per day decreased from 37.5 (20.8% of parenteral opioid doses before the restriction) to 0.22 (0.1% of parenteral opioid doses, P = .001). The total number of opioid doses and morphine doses given did not change, whereas the number of hydromorphone doses increased significantly postrestriction, from 16.0 doses per day (8.9% of total) to 59.7 doses per day (29.5%) (P = .009).

CONCLUSION

Meperidine formulary restriction, supported by an educational program and computerized order entry, effectively eliminated analgesic meperidine use. Hydromorphone use increased proportionately to offset the decreased use of meperidine.

摘要

目的

尽管与其他阿片类镇痛药相比,哌替啶存在独特的缺点,但它仍是常用的镇痛药。本研究的目的是衡量哌替啶处方集限制对胃肠外阿片类镇痛药处方的影响。

材料与方法

本研究在纽约罗切斯特一家拥有750张床位的三级护理教学医院进行。处方集限制将哌替啶仅用于寒战或程序性镇静,并辅以一项教育倡议和一个计算机化医嘱录入系统。在数据收集期间,独立的计算机化药房记录用于获取急诊科或内科或外科住院病房给予患者的所有胃肠外吗啡、哌替啶和氢吗啡酮剂量。在处方集限制实施前的两个3天期间收集基线数据;然后在处方集限制实施后的15个月内的三个3天期间收集对照数据。

结果

哌替啶每日给药剂量从37.5(限制前胃肠外阿片类药物剂量的20.8%)降至0.22(胃肠外阿片类药物剂量的0.1%,P = .001)。阿片类药物总剂量和吗啡剂量未发生变化,而氢吗啡酮剂量在限制实施后显著增加,从每日16.0剂(占总数的8.9%)增至每日59.7剂(占29.5%)(P = .009)。

结论

在一项教育计划和计算机化医嘱录入的支持下,哌替啶处方集限制有效地消除了作为镇痛药的哌替啶的使用。氢吗啡酮的使用相应增加,以抵消哌替啶使用的减少。

相似文献

1
Eliminating analgesic meperidine use with a supported formulary restriction.通过支持性的处方限制消除镇痛剂哌替啶的使用。
Am J Med. 2005 Aug;118(8):885-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.01.061.
2
Underdosing of morphine in comparison with other parenteral opioids in an acute hospital: a quality of care challenge.急性医院中与其他胃肠外阿片类药物相比,吗啡给药不足:一项护理质量挑战。
Pain Med. 2006 Jul-Aug;7(4):299-307. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2006.00183.x.
3
Multifaceted education initiative minimizes pethidine prescribing in the emergency department.多方面教育举措可最大限度减少急诊科哌替啶的处方量。
Emerg Med Australas. 2007 Feb;19(1):25-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2006.00911.x.
4
Pethidine in emergency departments: promoting evidence-based prescribing.急诊科中的哌替啶:促进循证处方
Med J Aust. 2005 Aug 1;183(3):129-33.
5
Outcomes after intravenous opioids in emergency patients: a prospective cohort analysis.急诊患者静脉注射阿片类药物后的结局:一项前瞻性队列分析。
Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Jun;16(6):477-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00405.x. Epub 2009 May 7.
6
Trends in medical use and abuse of opioid analgesics.阿片类镇痛药的医疗使用及滥用趋势。
JAMA. 2000 Apr 5;283(13):1710-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.13.1710.
7
Efficacy and safety profile of a single dose of hydromorphone compared with morphine in older adults with acute, severe pain: a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial.单剂量氢吗啡酮与吗啡用于急性重度疼痛老年患者的疗效和安全性比较:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲临床试验
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2009 Feb;7(1):1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2009.02.002.
8
Morphine induces less nausea than meperidine when administered parenterally.
J Emerg Med. 2004 Oct;27(3):241-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2004.04.011.
9
Potential for nonnarcotic analgesics to save personnel costs associated with controlling injectable morphine and meperidine.非麻醉性镇痛药在节省与控制注射用吗啡和哌替啶相关的人员成本方面的潜力。
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1990 May;47(5):1084-8.
10
Prevalence of meperidine use in older surgical patients.
Arch Surg. 2006 Jan;141(1):76-81. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.141.1.76.

引用本文的文献

1
Metabolic -Dealkylation and -Oxidation as Elucidators of the Role of Alkylamino Moieties in Drugs Acting at Various Receptors.代谢脱烷基化和氧化在阐明各种受体作用的药物中氨基烷基部分的作用。
Molecules. 2021 Mar 29;26(7):1917. doi: 10.3390/molecules26071917.
2
Impact of removal and restriction of me-too medicines in a hospital drug formulary on in- and outpatient drug prescriptions: interrupted time series design with comparison group.在医院药品处方集内移除和限制仿制药对门诊和住院患者药物处方的影响:基于对照组的中断时间序列设计。
Implement Sci. 2019 Jul 24;14(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0924-0.
3
Intravenous dexmedetomidine for the treatment of shivering during Cesarean delivery under neuraxial anesthesia: a randomized-controlled trial.
椎管内麻醉下剖宫产术中寒战的静脉用右美托咪定治疗:一项随机对照试验。
Can J Anaesth. 2019 Jul;66(7):762-771. doi: 10.1007/s12630-019-01354-3. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
4
De-implementation of low value castration for men with prostate cancer: protocol for a theory-based, mixed methods approach to minimizing low value androgen deprivation therapy (DeADT).取消前列腺癌男性的低价值阉割:基于理论的、混合方法的最小化低价值雄激素剥夺治疗(DeADT)的方案。
Implement Sci. 2018 Nov 29;13(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0833-7.
5
Codeine use among children in the United States: a nationally representative study from 1996 to 2013.美国儿童中可待因的使用情况:一项1996年至2013年具有全国代表性的研究。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2017 Jan;27(1):19-27. doi: 10.1111/pan.13033. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
6
The safety of meperidine prescribing in older adults: A longitudinal population-based study.老年人哌替啶处方的安全性:一项基于人群的纵向研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2016 May 11;16:100. doi: 10.1186/s12877-016-0275-5.
7
Voluntary warnings and the limits of good prescribing behavior: the case for de-adoption of meperidine.自愿性警示与合理处方行为的局限性:停用哌替啶的案例
J Pain Res. 2015 Dec 15;8:879-84. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S96625. eCollection 2015.
8
National patterns of codeine prescriptions for children in the emergency department.急诊科儿童可待因处方的全国模式。
Pediatrics. 2014 May;133(5):e1139-47. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-3171. Epub 2014 Apr 21.
9
Trends and characteristics of pethidine use in Taiwan: a six-year-long survey.台湾哌替啶使用的趋势和特征:一项长达六年的调查。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2012 Jul;67(7):749-55. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2012(07)08.
10
A systematic review of educational interventions to change behaviour of prescribers in hospital settings, with a particular emphasis on new prescribers.医院环境中改变处方行为的教育干预措施的系统评价,特别强调新处方者。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Feb;75(2):359-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04397.x.