Valentín A, Alarcón G, García-Seoane J J, Lacruz M E, Nayak S D, Honavar M, Selway R P, Binnie C D, Polkey C E
Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Guy's, King's, and St. Thomas' School of Medicine, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
Neurology. 2005 Aug 9;65(3):426-35. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000171340.73078.c1.
To assess the value of single-pulse electrical stimulation (SPES) to identify frontal epileptogenic cortex during presurgical assessment.
SPES (1-millisecond pulses, 4 to 8 mA, 0.1 Hz) has been used during chronic recordings in 30 patients with intracranial electrodes in the frontal lobes. As a result of presurgical assessment, 17 patients were considered to have frontal epilepsy and 13 extrafrontal epilepsy.
Two types of responses to SPES were seen: 1) early responses: starting immediately after the stimulus and considered as normal responses; 2) late responses: two types of responses seen in some areas after the initial early response: a) delayed responses: spikes or sharp waves occurring between 100 milliseconds and 1 second after stimulation. Frontal delayed responses were seen in 11 frontal patients and 1 extrafrontal patient, whereas extrafrontal delayed responses were seen in 1 frontal and 10 extrafrontal patients. b) Repetitive responses: two or more consecutive sharp-and-slow-wave complexes, each resembling the initial early response. Repetitive responses were seen only when stimulating the frontal lobes of 10 frontal patients. Among the 17 frontal patients, 13 had late responses exclusively in the epileptogenic frontal lobe, whereas only 3 showed them in both frontal lobes. Frontal late responses were associated with neuropathologic abnormalities, and complete resection of abnormal SPES areas was associated with good postsurgical seizure outcome.
Single-pulse electrical stimulation (SPES) could be an important additional investigation during presurgical assessment to identify frontal epileptogenicity. SPES can be useful in patients who have widespread or multiple epileptogenic areas, normal neuroimaging, or few seizures during telemetry.
评估单脉冲电刺激(SPES)在术前评估中识别额叶致痫皮层的价值。
在30例额叶植入颅内电极的患者进行长期记录期间使用了SPES(1毫秒脉冲,4至8毫安,0.1赫兹)。作为术前评估的结果,17例患者被认为患有额叶癫痫,13例患有额叶外癫痫。
观察到对SPES的两种反应类型:1)早期反应:刺激后立即开始,被视为正常反应;2)晚期反应:在最初的早期反应后在某些区域观察到的两种反应类型:a)延迟反应:刺激后100毫秒至1秒之间出现的棘波或锐波。11例额叶患者和1例额叶外患者出现额叶延迟反应,而1例额叶患者和10例额叶外患者出现额叶外延迟反应。b)重复反应:两个或更多连续的尖慢波复合波,每个都类似于最初的早期反应。仅在刺激10例额叶患者的额叶时观察到重复反应。在17例额叶患者中,13例仅在致痫额叶出现晚期反应,而只有3例在双侧额叶均出现。额叶晚期反应与神经病理学异常相关,对异常SPES区域的完全切除与良好的术后癫痫发作结果相关。
单脉冲电刺激(SPES)可能是术前评估中识别额叶致痫性的一项重要补充检查。SPES对具有广泛或多个致痫区域、神经影像学正常或在遥测期间发作较少的患者可能有用。