Rotter Nicole, Haisch Andreas, Bücheler Markus
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein Lübeck Campus, Lübeck, Germany.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2005 Jul;262(7):539-45. doi: 10.1007/s00405-004-0866-1. Epub 2004 Dec 10.
The loss of cartilage and bone because of congential defects, trauma and after tumor resection is a major clinical problem in head and neck surgery. The most prevalent methods of tissue repair are through autologous grafting or using implants. Tissue engineering applies the principles of engineering and life sciences in order to create bioartificial cartilage and bone. Most strategies for cartilage tissue engineering are based on resorbable biomaterials as temporary scaffolds for chondrocytes or precursor cells. Clinical application of tissue-engineered cartilage for reconstructive head and neck surgery as opposed to orthopedic applications has not been well established. While in orthopedic and trauma surgery engineered constructs or autologous chondrocytes are placed in the immunoprivileged region of joints, the subcutaneous transplant site in the head and neck can lead to strong inflammatory reactions and resorption of the bioartificial cartilage. Encapsulation of the engineered cartilage and modulation of the local immune response are potential strategies to overcome these limitations. In bone tissue engineering the combination of osteoconductive matrices, osteoinductive proteins such as bone morphogenetic proteins and osteogenic progenitor cells from the bone marrow or osteoblasts from bone biopsies offer a variety of tools for bone reconstruction in the craniofacial area. The utility of each technique is site dependent. Osteoconductive approaches are limited in that they merely create a favorable environment for bone formation, but do not play an active role in the recruitment of cells to the defect. Delivery of inductive signals from a scaffold can incite cells to migrate into a defect and control the progression of bone formation. Rapid osteoid matrix production in the defect site is best accomplished by using osteoblasts or progenitor cells.
由于先天性缺陷、创伤以及肿瘤切除后导致的软骨和骨组织缺失,是头颈外科领域的一个主要临床问题。组织修复最常用的方法是自体移植或使用植入物。组织工程学运用工程学和生命科学原理来制造生物人工软骨和骨。大多数软骨组织工程策略基于可吸收生物材料,作为软骨细胞或前体细胞的临时支架。与整形外科应用相比,组织工程化软骨在头颈重建手术中的临床应用尚未得到充分确立。在整形外科和创伤外科中,工程构建体或自体软骨细胞被置于关节的免疫赦免区域,而头颈部位的皮下移植部位可能会引发强烈的炎症反应,导致生物人工软骨吸收。封装工程化软骨并调节局部免疫反应是克服这些局限性的潜在策略。在骨组织工程中,骨传导基质、骨诱导蛋白(如骨形态发生蛋白)与来自骨髓的成骨祖细胞或骨活检获得的成骨细胞相结合,为颅面区域的骨重建提供了多种工具。每种技术的效用都取决于具体部位。骨传导方法的局限性在于,它们仅仅为骨形成创造了一个有利的环境,但在将细胞招募到缺损部位方面并不发挥积极作用。从支架传递诱导信号可以促使细胞迁移到缺损部位,并控制骨形成的进程。通过使用成骨细胞或祖细胞,能够最好地在缺损部位快速生成类骨质基质。