• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Not just for experts: the public debate about reprogenetics in Germany.

作者信息

Braun Kathrin

机构信息

Jackson School of International Studies, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.

出版信息

Hastings Cent Rep. 2005 May-Jun;35(3):42-9.

PMID:16092401
Abstract

When reproductive and genetic technologies spurred an extended German policy debate, the issues at stake went beyond the technologies to include the very meaning of "ethics" and the respective roles of ethicists and of the public in thinking about ethical questions.

摘要

相似文献

1
Not just for experts: the public debate about reprogenetics in Germany.
Hastings Cent Rep. 2005 May-Jun;35(3):42-9.
2
Regulating eugenics.规范优生学。
Harv Law Rev. 2008 Apr;121(6):1578-99.
3
Reason as our guide.以理性为指引。
PLoS Biol. 2004 Apr;2(4):E116. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020116. Epub 2004 Mar 5.
4
Does bioethics provide answers?: Secular and religious bioethics and our procreative future.生物伦理学能提供答案吗?:世俗与宗教生物伦理学以及我们的生殖未来。
Cumberland Law Rev. 2004;35(3):473-517.
5
Authenticity and ambivalence: toward understanding the enhancement debate.真实性与矛盾性:迈向对增强辩论的理解
Hastings Cent Rep. 2005 May-Jun;35(3):34-41.
6
Needed: a modest proposal.
Hastings Cent Rep. 2007 Nov-Dec;37(6):6-7; author reply 10-1.
7
Reprogenetics and the "parents have always done it" argument.生殖遗传学与“父母一直都是这样做的”论点。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2011 Jan-Feb;41(1):43-9. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-146x.2011.tb00099.x.
8
Genetic technologies and the regulation of reproductive decision-making in Australia.澳大利亚的基因技术与生殖决策监管
J Law Med. 2006 Aug;14(1):127-34.
9
Needed: a modest proposal.需要:一个温和的提议。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2007 Nov-Dec;37(6):8; author reply 9-11.
10
Canadian regulation of assisted reproductive technologies?
Hastings Cent Rep. 2001 Jul-Aug;31(4):8.

引用本文的文献

1
Non-invasive prenatal testing in Germany: a unique ethical and policy landscape.德国的无创性产前检测:独特的伦理和政策环境。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2023 May;31(5):562-567. doi: 10.1038/s41431-022-01256-x. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
2
Contested change: how Germany came to allow PGD.有争议的变革:德国如何开始允许实施胚胎植入前基因诊断
Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2016 Dec 13;3:60-67. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2016.11.002. eCollection 2016 Dec.
3
Evidence, ethics and inclusion: a broader base for NICE.证据、伦理与包容性:英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所的更广泛基础
Med Health Care Philos. 2011 May;14(2):111-21. doi: 10.1007/s11019-010-9256-1.