Suppr超能文献

半脱位:教条还是科学?

Subluxation: dogma or science?

作者信息

Keating Joseph C, Charlton Keith H, Grod Jaroslaw P, Perle Stephen M, Sikorski David, Winterstein James F

出版信息

Chiropr Osteopat. 2005 Aug 10;13:17. doi: 10.1186/1746-1340-13-17.

Abstract

Subluxation syndrome is a legitimate, potentially testable, theoretical construct for which there is little experimental evidence. Acceptable as hypothesis, the widespread assertion of the clinical meaningfulness of this notion brings ridicule from the scientific and health care communities and confusion within the chiropractic profession. We believe that an evidence-orientation among chiropractors requires that we distinguish between subluxation dogma vs. subluxation as the potential focus of clinical research. We lament efforts to generate unity within the profession through consensus statements concerning subluxation dogma, and believe that cultural authority will continue to elude us so long as we assert dogma as though it were validated clinical theory.

摘要

半脱位综合征是一个合理的、具有潜在可测试性的理论概念,但几乎没有实验证据支持。作为一种假设可以接受,然而这种概念在临床方面具有重要意义的广泛断言却遭到了科学和医疗保健界的嘲笑,并在整脊行业内引发了混乱。我们认为,整脊师以证据为导向要求我们区分半脱位教条与半脱位作为临床研究潜在重点之间的差异。我们对通过关于半脱位教条的共识声明在行业内达成统一的努力感到遗憾,并认为只要我们将教条当作经过验证的临床理论来宣扬,我们就将继续无法获得文化权威。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fea/1208927/893c8e464ef0/1746-1340-13-17-1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验