Keating Joseph C, Charlton Keith H, Grod Jaroslaw P, Perle Stephen M, Sikorski David, Winterstein James F
Chiropr Osteopat. 2005 Aug 10;13:17. doi: 10.1186/1746-1340-13-17.
Subluxation syndrome is a legitimate, potentially testable, theoretical construct for which there is little experimental evidence. Acceptable as hypothesis, the widespread assertion of the clinical meaningfulness of this notion brings ridicule from the scientific and health care communities and confusion within the chiropractic profession. We believe that an evidence-orientation among chiropractors requires that we distinguish between subluxation dogma vs. subluxation as the potential focus of clinical research. We lament efforts to generate unity within the profession through consensus statements concerning subluxation dogma, and believe that cultural authority will continue to elude us so long as we assert dogma as though it were validated clinical theory.
半脱位综合征是一个合理的、具有潜在可测试性的理论概念,但几乎没有实验证据支持。作为一种假设可以接受,然而这种概念在临床方面具有重要意义的广泛断言却遭到了科学和医疗保健界的嘲笑,并在整脊行业内引发了混乱。我们认为,整脊师以证据为导向要求我们区分半脱位教条与半脱位作为临床研究潜在重点之间的差异。我们对通过关于半脱位教条的共识声明在行业内达成统一的努力感到遗憾,并认为只要我们将教条当作经过验证的临床理论来宣扬,我们就将继续无法获得文化权威。