Lippi Giuseppe, Salvagno Gian Luca, Montagnana Martina, Guidi Gian Cesare
Department of Morphological and Biomedical Science, Clinical Chemistry Institute, University of Verona, Italy.
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2005 Sep;16(6):453-8. doi: 10.1097/01.mbc.0000178828.59866.03.
Preanalytical variability is a common source of errors in coagulation testing, as clotting assays are particularly susceptible to poor standardization of the whole analytical process. To investigate the effect of a short-term venous stasis on routine coagulation testing, we measured activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time, fibrinogen and D-dimer in plasma specimens collected either without venous stasis or following the application of a 60 mmHg constant, standardized external pressure by a sphygmomanometer, for 1 (1-min stasis) and 3 min (3-min stasis). When compared with blood specimens collected without stasis, the Pearson's correlation coefficients and the corresponding slopes of the Passing and Bablok regression line of samples collected following 1 and 3-min stasis were acceptable. However, statistically significant differences by paired Student's t-test could be observed for all parameters tests following 3-min stasis, and for all but the activated partial thromboplastin time after 1-min stasis. Significant difference between specimens collected after 1- and 3-min stasis was also achieved for prothrombin time (P < 0.01), fibrinogen (P < 0.01) and D-dimer (P < 0.05). The agreement between measurements was yet acceptable after 1-min stasis, but achieved clinical significance for prothrombin time, fibrinogen and D-dimer after 3-min stasis. Taken together, results of the present investigation confirm that the effects of venous stasis during venipuncture are clinically meaningful. As hematocrit values and activities of clotting factors VII, VIII and XII significantly increased, whereas that of activated factor VII remained unchanged, we hypothesize that a short-term venous stasis, as induced by up to 3-min tourniquet placing, might not be sufficient to produce additional procoagulant responses besides hemoconcentration.
分析前的变异性是凝血检测中常见的误差来源,因为凝血检测对整个分析过程标准化不佳尤为敏感。为了研究短期静脉淤滞对常规凝血检测的影响,我们在无静脉淤滞或使用血压计施加60 mmHg恒定、标准化外部压力后,分别采集血浆标本,测量活化部分凝血活酶时间、凝血酶原时间、纤维蛋白原和D - 二聚体,施加压力时间分别为1分钟(1分钟淤滞)和3分钟(3分钟淤滞)。与无淤滞时采集的血液标本相比,1分钟和3分钟淤滞后采集样本的Pearson相关系数以及Passing和Bablok回归线的相应斜率是可接受的。然而,3分钟淤滞后所有参数检测以及1分钟淤滞后除活化部分凝血活酶时间外的所有参数检测,通过配对t检验可观察到具有统计学意义的差异。1分钟和3分钟淤滞后采集的标本在凝血酶原时间(P < 0.01)、纤维蛋白原(P < 0.01)和D - 二聚体(P < 0.05)方面也存在显著差异。1分钟淤滞后测量结果之间的一致性尚可接受,但3分钟淤滞后凝血酶原时间、纤维蛋白原和D - 二聚体达到了临床意义。综上所述,本研究结果证实静脉穿刺期间静脉淤滞的影响具有临床意义。由于血细胞比容值以及凝血因子VII、VIII和XII的活性显著增加,而活化因子VII的活性保持不变,我们推测长达3分钟的止血带放置所诱导的短期静脉淤滞,除血液浓缩外可能不足以产生额外的促凝反应。