Lippi G, Salvagno G L, Montagnana M, Franchini M, Guidi G C
Sezione di Chimica e Microscopia Clinica, Dipartimento di Scienze Morfologico-Biomediche, Università degli Studi di Verona, Verona, Italy.
Clin Lab Haematol. 2006 Oct;28(5):332-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2257.2006.00818.x.
Prolonged venous stasis, as generated by a long tourniquet placement, produces spurious variations in several measurable analytes. To verify to what extent venous stasis influences routine hematologic testing, we assessed routine hematologic parameters, including hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cell count (RBC), main cell hemoglobin (MHC), main cell volume (MCV), platelet count (PLT), main platelet volume (MPV), white blood cell count (WBC) and WBC differential on the Advia 120 automated hematology analyzer in 30 healthy volunteers, either without venous stasis (no stasis) or after application of a 60 mmHg standardized external pressure by a sphygmomanometer, for 1 (1-min stasis) and 3 min (3-min stasis). Although the overall correlation between measures was globally acceptable, the mean values for paired samples were significantly different in all parameters tested, except MCV, MHC, PLT, MPV, eosinophils, basophils and large unstained cells after 1-min stasis and all parameters except MCV, MHC, MPV and basophils after 3-min venous stasis. As expected RBC, hemoglobin and hematocrit displayed a significant trend towards increase, whereas WBC and the WBC subpopulations were decreased. Difference between measurements by Bland and Altman plots exceeded the current analytical quality specifications for desirable bias for WBC, RBC, hemoglobin, hematocrit, lymphocytes and monocytes in samples collected after either 1- and 3-min stasis. These results provide clear evidence that venous stasis during venipuncture might produce spurious and clinically meaningful biases in the measurement of several hematologic parameters, prompting further considerations on the usefulness of adopting appropriate preventive measures for minimizing such influences.
长时间使用止血带导致的静脉淤滞会使多种可测量分析物产生假性变化。为了验证静脉淤滞对常规血液学检测的影响程度,我们在30名健康志愿者中评估了常规血液学参数,包括血红蛋白、血细胞比容、红细胞计数(RBC)、平均细胞血红蛋白(MHC)、平均细胞体积(MCV)、血小板计数(PLT)、平均血小板体积(MPV)、白细胞计数(WBC)以及白细胞分类,使用的是Advia 120自动血液分析仪。这些志愿者分别处于无静脉淤滞(无淤滞)状态,或在使用血压计施加60 mmHg标准化外部压力1分钟(1分钟淤滞)和3分钟(3分钟淤滞)之后。尽管各项测量之间的总体相关性在整体上是可接受的,但除了1分钟淤滞后的MCV、MHC、PLT、MPV、嗜酸性粒细胞、嗜碱性粒细胞和大未染色细胞,以及3分钟静脉淤滞后除MCV、MHC、MPV和嗜碱性粒细胞之外的所有参数外,配对样本的平均值在所有测试参数中均存在显著差异。正如预期的那样,RBC、血红蛋白和血细胞比容呈现出显著的上升趋势,而WBC及其亚群则下降。在1分钟和3分钟淤滞后采集的样本中,通过Bland和Altman图测量的差异超过了目前WBC、RBC、血红蛋白、血细胞比容、淋巴细胞和单核细胞理想偏差的分析质量规范。这些结果提供了明确的证据,表明静脉穿刺期间的静脉淤滞可能会在几种血液学参数的测量中产生假性且具有临床意义的偏差,这促使人们进一步考虑采取适当的预防措施以尽量减少此类影响的有用性。