Suppr超能文献

从社区居住老年人中获得的三种力量测量方法的信度和效度。

Reliability and validity of three strength measures obtained from community-dwelling elderly persons.

作者信息

Schaubert Karen L, Bohannon Richard W

机构信息

School of Allied Health, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269, USA.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2005 Aug;19(3):717-20. doi: 10.1519/R-15954.1.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to describe the reliability and validity of 3 strength measures obtained from community-dwelling elderly individuals. The strength of 10 elders was tested initially and 6 and 12 weeks later using the MicroFET 2 hand-held dynamometer (knee extension strength), the Jamar dynamometer (grip strength), and the sit-to-stand (STS) test. Mobility was tested using the timed up-and-go (TUG) test and a timed walk test. Intraclass correlation coefficients, which were used to characterize the reliability of the strength tests, ranged from 0.807 to 0.981. Pearson correlations between the lower extremity strength measures and the TUG and gait speed ranged from 0.635 to -0.943. Our examination of the 3 measures for 12 weeks extends previous evidence of the stability of these strength measures and justifies the use of hand-held dynamometry and the STS test when investigating limitations in mobility.

摘要

本研究的目的是描述从社区居住的老年人中获得的3种力量测量方法的可靠性和有效性。最初对10名老年人的力量进行了测试,并在6周和12周后使用MicroFET 2手持式测力计(膝关节伸展力量)、Jamar测力计(握力)和坐立试验(STS)进行测试。使用定时起立行走(TUG)试验和定时步行试验测试活动能力。用于表征力量测试可靠性的组内相关系数范围为0.807至0.981。下肢力量测量与TUG和步速之间的Pearson相关性范围为0.635至-0.943。我们对这3种测量方法进行了12周的研究,扩展了这些力量测量方法稳定性的先前证据,并证明在研究活动能力受限情况时使用手持式测力计和STS试验是合理的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验