Suzuki Makoto, Yamada Sumio, Inamura Atsushi, Omori Yoshitsugu, Kirimoto Hikari, Sugimura Seiichiro, Miyamoto Masaaki
Faculty of Medical Technology, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, Japan.
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Nov;88(11):924-33. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181ae1003.
To describe the reliability of strength measurement by hand-held dynamometer and to identify the prediction of gait and stand-up ability by the strength measurement in people with dementia.
Correlational study in which 60 persons with Alzheimer disease were enrolled. The strength of knee extensor was measured twice separated by a 3-min interval using a hand-held dynamometer. The presence or absence of impaired gait and sit-to-stand was also determined.
Intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.97. Bland-Altman plots showed the distribution of test-retest differences in the subjects with Mini-Mental State Examination score of 10 points or fewer, increased with isometric knee extensor strength. Logistic regression analysis showed strength of the knee extensor muscles to be a significant predictor of gait performance (odds ratio, 443.0; 95% confidence interval, 9.20-21325.7) and sit-to-stand performance (odds ratio, 47.32; 95% confidence interval, 3.31-675.8).
The strength measurement with a hand-held dynamometer was reliable in people with dementia. Furthermore, normalized knee extensor strength was indicated to be a significant predictor of gait and sit-to-stand performance. However, caution is needed when interpreting the result of strength measurement when it is carried out on subjects with a Mini-Mental State Examination score of 10 points or fewer and with a high strength level.
描述手持测力计测量力量的可靠性,并确定痴呆患者力量测量对步态和起立能力的预测作用。
对60名阿尔茨海默病患者进行的相关性研究。使用手持测力计,在3分钟的间隔后对膝伸肌力量进行两次测量。同时确定是否存在步态和从坐到站能力受损的情况。
组内相关系数为0.97。Bland-Altman图显示,简易精神状态检查表评分10分及以下的受试者,重测差异的分布随等长膝伸肌力量增加。逻辑回归分析显示,膝伸肌力量是步态表现(优势比,443.0;95%置信区间,9.20 - 21325.7)和从坐到站表现(优势比,47.32;95%置信区间,3.31 - 675.8)的显著预测指标。
手持测力计测量痴呆患者的力量是可靠的。此外,标准化膝伸肌力量被证明是步态和从坐到站表现的显著预测指标。然而,对简易精神状态检查表评分10分及以下且力量水平较高的受试者进行力量测量结果解读时需谨慎。