Suppr超能文献

甲己炔巴比妥和丙泊酚联合或不联合阿芬太尼对电休克治疗中癫痫发作持续时间及恢复情况的影响。

Effect of methohexitone and propofol with or without alfentanil on seizure duration and recovery in electroconvulsive therapy.

作者信息

Nguyen T T, Chhibber A K, Lustik S J, Kolano J W, Dillon P J, Guttmacher L B

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, New York, NY 14642, USA.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 1997 Dec;79(6):801-3. doi: 10.1093/bja/79.6.801.

Abstract

We have studied the effects of methohexitone and propofol with and without alfentanil on seizure duration and recovery in this observer-blinded, prospective, randomized, crossover study involving 24 patients undergoing electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Each patient had four treatment sessions, and received the following four i.v. regimens in random order: methohexitone 0.75 mg kg-1, methohexitone 0.50 mg kg-1 and alfentanil 10 micrograms kg-1, propofol 0.75 mg kg-1, propofol 0.50 mg kg-1 and alfentanil 10 micrograms kg-1. Additional methohexitone or propofol was given as needed in 10-20-mg increments until loss of consciousness. Suxamethonium 1.0 mg kg-1 i.v. was given for muscular paralysis. Mean motor and EEG seizure durations were longer with methohexitone-alfentanil (44.7 (SD 15.0) and 70.5 (29.7) s) than with methohexitone (37.6 (12.6) and 52.6 (15.3) s) and similarly, seizures were longer with propofol-alfentanil (36.8 (15.2) and 54.5 (20.9) s) than with propofol alone (27.2 (11.9) and 39.2 (3.9) s). Seizures were longest with methohexitone-alfentanil and shortest with propofol. Recovery time was statistically shorter in patients receiving propofol compared with methohexitone-alfentanil and methohexitone alone. Alfentanil with a reduced dose of methohexitone or propofol provided unconsciousness and increased seizure duration in patients undergoing ECT. We conclude that the combination of methohexitone with alfentanil is a good regimen for ECT, especially for patients with short seizure duration.

摘要

在这项观察者盲法、前瞻性、随机、交叉研究中,我们研究了美索比妥和丙泊酚在有或没有阿芬太尼的情况下对24例接受电惊厥治疗(ECT)患者的癫痫发作持续时间和恢复情况的影响。每位患者进行四个治疗疗程,并随机接受以下四种静脉给药方案:美索比妥0.75mg/kg、美索比妥0.50mg/kg加阿芬太尼10μg/kg、丙泊酚0.75mg/kg、丙泊酚0.50mg/kg加阿芬太尼10μg/kg。根据需要以10 - 20mg的增量给予额外的美索比妥或丙泊酚,直至意识丧失。静脉注射琥珀胆碱1.0mg/kg用于肌肉麻痹。与单独使用美索比妥相比,美索比妥 - 阿芬太尼组的平均运动和脑电图癫痫发作持续时间更长(分别为44.7(标准差15.0)和70.5(29.7)秒),美索比妥组分别为37.6(12.6)和52.6(15.3)秒;同样,与单独使用丙泊酚相比,丙泊酚 - 阿芬太尼组的癫痫发作持续时间更长(分别为36.8(15.2)和54.5(20.9)秒),丙泊酚组分别为27.2(11.9)和39.2(3.9)秒。美索比妥 - 阿芬太尼组的癫痫发作最长,丙泊酚组最短。与接受美索比妥 - 阿芬太尼和单独使用美索比妥的患者相比,接受丙泊酚的患者恢复时间在统计学上更短。阿芬太尼与降低剂量的美索比妥或丙泊酚联合使用可使接受ECT的患者失去意识并延长癫痫发作持续时间。我们得出结论,美索比妥与阿芬太尼联合使用是ECT的良好方案,特别是对于癫痫发作持续时间短 的患者。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验