Mitchell Gordon
The Institute for Transport Studies and the School of Geography, The University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
J Environ Manage. 2005 Nov;77(3):212-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.04.013. Epub 2005 Aug 10.
Sustainable development requires that the goals of economic development, environmental protection and social justice are considered collectively when formulating development strategies. In the context of planning sustainable transport systems, trade-offs between the economy and the environment, and between the economy and social justice have received considerable attention. In contrast, much less attention has been paid to environmental equity, the trade-off between environmental and social justice goals, a significant omission given the growing attention to environmental justice by policy makers in the EU and elsewhere. In many countries, considerable effort has been made to develop clean transport systems by using, for example, technical, economic and planning instruments. However, little effort has been made to understand the distributive and environmental justice implications of these measures. This paper investigates the relationship between urban air quality (as NO2) and social deprivation for the city of Leeds, UK. Through application of a series of linked dynamic models of traffic simulation and assignment, vehicle emission, and pollutant dispersion, the environmental equity implications of a series of urban transport strategies, including road user cordon and distance-based charging, road network development, and emission control are assessed. Results indicate a significant degree of environmental inequity exists in Leeds. Analysis of the transport strategies indicates that this inequity will be reduced through natural fleet renewal, and, perhaps contrary to expectations, road user charging is also capable of promoting environmental equity. The environmental equity response is, however, sensitive to road pricing scheme design.
可持续发展要求在制定发展战略时,综合考虑经济发展、环境保护和社会公平的目标。在规划可持续交通系统的背景下,经济与环境之间以及经济与社会公平之间的权衡受到了广泛关注。相比之下,环境公平,即环境与社会公平目标之间的权衡,却很少受到关注,鉴于欧盟及其他地区的政策制定者对环境公平的关注度不断提高,这是一个重大疏漏。在许多国家,已经做出了相当大的努力,例如通过技术、经济和规划手段来发展清洁交通系统。然而,对于这些措施的分配和环境公平影响却很少有人去了解。本文研究了英国利兹市城市空气质量(以二氧化氮计)与社会剥夺之间的关系。通过应用一系列相互关联的动态模型,包括交通模拟与分配、车辆排放和污染物扩散模型,评估了一系列城市交通战略的环境公平影响,这些战略包括道路使用者警戒线和基于距离的收费、道路网络发展以及排放控制。结果表明,利兹市存在显著程度的环境不公平。对交通战略的分析表明,通过自然的车队更新,这种不公平将得以减少,而且,也许与预期相反,道路使用者收费也能够促进环境公平。然而,环境公平响应对于道路定价方案的设计很敏感。