Korsgaard Jens, Møller Jens K, Kilian Mogens
Department of Chest Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital Aalborg, Denmark.
Int J Infect Dis. 2005 Sep;9(5):274-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2004.07.013.
To analyze the possible influence of antibiotic treatment on the results of different diagnostic tests for the diagnosis of lower respiratory tract infections with Streptococcus pneumoniae.
A prospective cohort of 159 unselected adult immunocompetent patients admitted to Silkeborg County Hospital in Denmark with community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections underwent microbiological investigations with fiber-optic bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage, blood and sputum culture and urine antigen test for type-specific polysaccharide capsular antigens of S. pneumoniae.
When stratified for antibiotic treatment prior to microbiological sampling, three different groups of patients with documented or probable infection with S. pneumoniae could be identified. The first group comprised 14 patients who were culture positive in one or more culture tests, where most (11/14) did not receive any antibiotic treatment within 24 hours of sampling. The second group consisted of nine patients with a positive urine antigen test where 8/9 and 9/9 received antibiotic treatment 24 and 48 hours, respectively, prior to urine sampling. Only a single patient was positive in both systems, making a total of 22 patients with documented pneumococcal infection. As a positive culture test was dependent on the absence of antibiotic treatment, whereas a positive urine antigen test depended on antibiotic treatment within 48 hours, the two tests were complementary in the diagnosis of infection with S. pneumoniae. The third group of patients with probable pneumococcal infection were identified as 26% and 20% of the remaining 137 patients with unknown or known non-pneumococcal etiology, respectively, who received recent antibiotic treatment within 2-4 weeks of diagnostic sampling. By comparison, 0% (p < 0.01) with documented pneumococcal infection received antibiotic treatment in weeks 2-4 prior to microbiological sampling. As such a further eight patients should be expected to have infection with S. pneumoniae but would test negative in both culture tests and the urine antigen test because of antibiotic treatment within weeks 2-4 prior to sampling.
The diagnosis of infection with S. pneumoniae is very dependent on whether or not recent (within 2-4 weeks) or immediate (within 48 hours) antibiotic treatment has been given prior to microbiological sampling of patients. The results suggest an optimized diagnostic strategy with, if possible, sampling for culture prior to antibiotic treatment, while sampling for pneumococcal antigens should wait 24-48 hours for antibiotic treatment.
分析抗生素治疗对肺炎链球菌所致下呼吸道感染不同诊断检测结果的可能影响。
对丹麦锡尔克堡县医院收治的159例未选择的具有社区获得性下呼吸道感染的成年免疫功能正常患者进行前瞻性队列研究,采用纤维支气管镜下支气管肺泡灌洗、血培养、痰培养及肺炎链球菌型特异性多糖荚膜抗原尿抗原检测进行微生物学调查。
根据微生物学采样前是否接受抗生素治疗进行分层时,可识别出三组记录在案或可能感染肺炎链球菌的患者。第一组包括14例在一项或多项培养检测中培养阳性的患者,其中大多数(11/14)在采样后24小时内未接受任何抗生素治疗。第二组由9例尿抗原检测呈阳性的患者组成,其中8/9和9/9分别在尿样采集前24小时和48小时接受了抗生素治疗。只有1例患者在两个检测系统中均呈阳性,因此共有22例记录在案的肺炎球菌感染患者。由于阳性培养检测取决于未使用抗生素治疗,而阳性尿抗原检测取决于在48小时内使用抗生素治疗,因此这两种检测在肺炎链球菌感染诊断中具有互补性。第三组可能感染肺炎球菌的患者分别占其余137例病因不明或已知非肺炎球菌病因患者的26%和20%,这些患者在诊断采样前2 - 4周内接受了近期抗生素治疗。相比之下,记录在案的肺炎球菌感染患者中,0%(p < 0.01)在微生物学采样前2 - 4周内接受了抗生素治疗。因此,预计另有8例患者感染肺炎链球菌,但由于在采样前2 - 4周内接受了抗生素治疗,在培养检测和尿抗原检测中均呈阴性。
肺炎链球菌感染的诊断很大程度上取决于患者在微生物学采样前是否接受了近期(2 - 4周内)或即刻(48小时内)的抗生素治疗。结果表明,一种优化的诊断策略是,若可能,在抗生素治疗前进行培养采样,而肺炎球菌抗原采样应在抗生素治疗后等待24 - 48小时。