Dorlac W C, DeBakey M E, Holcomb J B, Fagan S P, Kwong K L, Dorlac G R, Schreiber M A, Persse D E, Moore F A, Mattox K L
US Army Institute of Surgical Research, Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234-6315, USA.
J Trauma. 2005 Jul;59(1):217-22. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000173699.71652.ba.
Although studies have ascertained that ten percent of soldiers killed in battle bleed to death from extremity wounds, little data exists on exsanguination and mortality from extremity injuries in civilian trauma. This study examined the treatment course and outcomes of civilian patients who appear to have exsanguinated from isolated penetrating extremity injuries.
Five and 1/2 years' data (Aug 1994 to Dec 1999) were reviewed from two Level I trauma centers that receive 95% of trauma patients in metropolitan Houston, TX. Records (hospital trauma registries, emergency medical system (EMS) and medical examiner data) were reviewed on all patients with isolated extremity injuries who arrived dead at the trauma center or underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) or emergency center thoracotomy (ECT).
Fourteen patients meeting inclusion criteria were identified from over 75,000 trauma emergency center (EC) visits. Average age was 31 years and 93% were males. Gunshot wounds accounted for 50% of the injuries. The exsanguinating wound was in the lower extremity in 10/14 (71%) patients and proximal to the elbow or knee in 12/14 (86%). Ten (71%) had both a major artery and vein injured; one had only a venous injury. Prehospital hemorrhage control was primarily by gauze dressings. Twelve (86%) had "signs of life" in the field, but none had a discernable blood pressure or pulse upon arrival at the EC. Prehospital intravenous access was not obtained in 10 patients (71%). Nine patients underwent ECT, and nine were initially resuscitated (eight with ECT and one with CPR). Those undergoing operative repair received an average of 26 +/- 14 units of packed red blood cells. All patients died, 93% succumbing within 12 hours.
Although rare, death from isolated extremity injuries does occur in the civilian population. The majority of injuries that lead to immediate death are proximal injuries of the lower extremities. The cause of death in this series appears to have been exsanguination, although definitive etiology cannot be discerned. Intravenous access was not obtainable in the majority of patients. Eight patients (57%) had bleeding from a site that anatomically might have been amenable to tourniquet control. Patients presenting to the EC without any detectable blood pressure and who received either CPR or EC thoracotomy all died.
尽管研究已确定在战斗中阵亡的士兵中有10%死于肢体伤口出血,但关于平民创伤中肢体损伤导致的失血性死亡的数据却很少。本研究调查了似乎因孤立性穿透性肢体损伤而失血性死亡的平民患者的治疗过程和结局。
回顾了来自德克萨斯州休斯顿市两家一级创伤中心5年半(1994年8月至1999年12月)的数据,这两家中心接收了休斯顿市95%的创伤患者。对所有因孤立性肢体损伤到达创伤中心时已死亡、或接受了心肺复苏(CPR)或急诊中心开胸手术(ECT)的患者的记录(医院创伤登记、急救医疗系统(EMS)和法医数据)进行了审查。
在超过75000次创伤急诊中心(EC)就诊中,确定了14名符合纳入标准的患者。平均年龄为31岁,93%为男性。枪伤占损伤的50%。10/14(71%)患者的失血性伤口在下肢,12/14(86%)在肘部或膝部近端。10名(71%)患者的主要动静脉均受损;1名仅静脉受损。院前出血控制主要通过纱布敷料。12名(86%)患者在现场有“生命体征”,但到达急诊中心时均无可察觉的血压或脉搏。10名患者(71%)未获得院前静脉通路。9名患者接受了ECT,9名患者最初复苏成功(8名接受ECT,1名接受CPR)。接受手术修复的患者平均输注了26±14单位的浓缩红细胞。所有患者均死亡,93%在12小时内死亡。
尽管罕见,但平民中确实会发生因孤立性肢体损伤导致的死亡。导致立即死亡的大多数损伤是下肢近端损伤。本系列病例的死亡原因似乎是失血性死亡,尽管无法确定确切病因。大多数患者无法获得静脉通路。8名患者(57%)的出血部位在解剖学上可能适合使用止血带控制。到达急诊中心时无任何可检测到的血压且接受了CPR或急诊中心开胸手术的患者均死亡。