Sluys Kerstin, Häggmark Tom, Iselius Lennart
Department of Surgical Science, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
J Trauma. 2005 Jul;59(1):223-32. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000173832.01547.cb.
This study aimed to determine quality of life after injury and identify factors potentially associated with outcome.
Five years after injury from blunt or penetrating trauma, patients received a questionnaire based on the SF-36 Health Survey.
Two hundred five patients (83%) replied. Most were men, median age 39 years, 93% injured by blunt energy, median Injury Severity Score 14 (range 9-57). Mean SF-36 scores were significantly lower than in a matched reference group. Poor outcome was associated with: in-hospital days, intensive care days, surgical procedures, in-hospital major complications, age, recurrent injury, and inadequate information. Subjects reported considerable physical (68%) and psychologic (41%) disabilities. Near half reported need of improved follow-up care. Injury severity did not predict poor health-related quality of life 5 years later.
Adequate information, sufficient pain management and follow-up by trauma specialist teams are needed. Certain factors can help identify patients in need of additional help and support.
本研究旨在确定受伤后的生活质量,并识别可能与预后相关的因素。
钝性或穿透性创伤受伤五年后,患者接受了基于SF-36健康调查的问卷调查。
205名患者(83%)进行了回复。大多数为男性,中位年龄39岁,93%因钝性外力受伤,中位损伤严重度评分为14分(范围9 - 57)。SF-36平均得分显著低于匹配的参照组。预后不良与以下因素相关:住院天数、重症监护天数、手术操作、院内主要并发症、年龄、再次受伤以及信息不足。受试者报告有相当程度的身体残疾(68%)和心理残疾(41%)。近半数报告需要改善后续护理。损伤严重程度并不能预测五年后的健康相关生活质量较差情况。
需要充分的信息、充分的疼痛管理以及创伤专科团队的随访。某些因素有助于识别需要额外帮助和支持的患者。