Rak K M, Yakes W F, Ray R L, Dreisbach J N, Parker S H, Luethke J M, Stavros A T, Slater D D, Burke B J
Department of Radiology, Fitzsimons Army Medical Center, Aurora, CO 80045-5001.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992 Jul;159(1):107-12. doi: 10.2214/ajr.159.1.1609682.
We performed a retrospective study of symptomatic peripheral vascular malformations to determine if MR imaging can be used to distinguish slow-flow venous malformations from high-flow arteriovenous malformations and arteriovenous fistulas. Twenty-seven MR examinations in 25 patients with malformations outside the CNS were reviewed. Sixteen venous malformations, nine arteriovenous malformations, and two arteriovenous fistulas were included. In all cases, the MR findings were correlated with the results of angiography. The distinction between slow-flow venous malformations and high-flow arteriovenous malformations and arteriovenous fistulas was made primarily on T2-weighted MR images, which showed high signal intensity in venous malformations and flow voids in high-flow lesions. In addition to the previously described MR features of venous malformations (serpentine pattern with septations, associated muscle atrophy, and typical T1 and T2 signal intensities), several new MR features were apparent. Venous malformations had a propensity for multifocal involvement (37%), orientation along the long axis of extremities or affected muscles (78%), and adherence to neurovascular distributions (64%). Prominent subcutaneous fat was commonly seen adjacent to the malformation. MR images of arteriovenous malformations and arteriovenous fistulas also commonly showed muscle atrophy and subcutaneous fatty prominence. Our results show that slow-flow venous malformations can be distinguished from high-flow arteriovenous malformations and fistulas on the basis of spin-echo MR signal characteristics. The associated imaging characteristics help in the differential diagnosis in problematic cases.
我们对有症状的周围血管畸形进行了一项回顾性研究,以确定磁共振成像(MR成像)是否可用于区分慢流性静脉畸形与高流性动静脉畸形及动静脉瘘。回顾了25例中枢神经系统外畸形患者的27次MR检查。其中包括16例静脉畸形、9例动静脉畸形和2例动静脉瘘。在所有病例中,MR表现均与血管造影结果相关。慢流性静脉畸形与高流性动静脉畸形及动静脉瘘的区分主要基于T2加权MR图像,静脉畸形在该图像上表现为高信号强度,而高流性病变则表现为流空信号。除了先前描述的静脉畸形的MR特征(有分隔的蜿蜒形态、相关的肌肉萎缩以及典型的T1和T2信号强度)外,还出现了一些新的MR特征。静脉畸形倾向于多灶性累及(37%)、沿肢体或受累肌肉的长轴走行(78%)以及附着于神经血管分布区域(64%)。在畸形旁常见明显的皮下脂肪。动静脉畸形和动静脉瘘的MR图像也常显示肌肉萎缩和皮下脂肪突出。我们的结果表明,基于自旋回波MR信号特征,慢流性静脉畸形可与高流性动静脉畸形及瘘相区分。相关的影像学特征有助于疑难病例的鉴别诊断。