Schnoll Robert A, Rothman Randi L, Wielt Dustin B, Lerman Caryn, Pedri Holly, Wang Hao, Babb James, Miller Suzanne M, Movsas Benjamin, Sherman Eric, Ridge John A, Unger Michael, Langer Corey, Goldberg Melvyn, Scott Walter, Cheng Jonathan
Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Cheltenham, Pennsylvania 19012, USA.
Ann Behav Med. 2005 Aug;30(1):1-11. doi: 10.1207/s15324796abm3001_1.
Previously, we have linked theoretically based cognitive and emotional variables to the ability of cancer patients to quit smoking.
In this study, we evaluated the impact of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), which addressed these theoretically derived cognitive and emotional variables linked to tobacco use in this population, for promoting smoking cessation in a sample of cancer patients and assessed longitudinal predictors of smoking cessation.
Cancer patients (N=109) were randomized to either the theoretically based CBT intervention or to a general health education (GHE) condition, and all patients received nicotine replacement therapy.
Contrary to our expectation, no significant difference in 30-day point-prevalence abstinence between the CBT and GHE conditions was detected at either a 1-month (44.9 vs. 47.3%, respectively) or 3-month (43.2% vs. 39.2%, respectively) follow-up evaluation. Higher quit motivation and lower cons of quitting were related to smoking cessation.
Implications for the implementation of smoking cessation behavioral treatments in the oncologic context are discussed, as are directions for future research in this area.
此前,我们已将基于理论的认知和情绪变量与癌症患者戒烟能力联系起来。
在本研究中,我们评估了认知行为疗法(CBT)对促进癌症患者样本戒烟的影响,该疗法针对了与该人群烟草使用相关的这些理论推导的认知和情绪变量,并评估了戒烟的纵向预测因素。
癌症患者(N = 109)被随机分为基于理论的CBT干预组或一般健康教育(GHE)组,所有患者均接受尼古丁替代疗法。
与我们的预期相反,在1个月(分别为44.9%对47.3%)或3个月(分别为43.2%对39.2%)的随访评估中,CBT组和GHE组在30天点患病率戒烟方面均未检测到显著差异。更高的戒烟动机和更低的戒烟弊端与戒烟有关。
讨论了在肿瘤学背景下实施戒烟行为治疗的意义,以及该领域未来研究的方向。