Bradizza Clara M, Stasiewicz Paul R, Zhuo Yue, Ruszczyk Melanie, Maisto Stephen A, Lucke Joseph F, Brandon Thomas H, Eiden Rina D, Slosman Kim S, Giarratano Paulette
Research Institute on Addictions, University at Buffalo-State University of New York, Buffalo, NY.
Sociology and Anthropology Department, St. John's University, Queens, NY.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2017 May 1;19(5):578-584. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw398.
Negative affect has been identified as a factor influencing continued smoking during pregnancy. In this study, a multi-component emotion regulation intervention was developed to address negative emotional smoking triggers and pilot-tested among low-income pregnant smokers. Treatment feasibility and acceptability, cotinine-verified rates of smoking cessation, and self-report of mean cigarettes smoked were assessed.
Pregnant smokers who self-reported smoking in response to negative affect (N = 70) were randomly assigned to receive one of two 8-session interventions: (1) emotion regulation treatment combined with standard cognitive-behavioral smoking cessation (ERT + CBT) or (2) a health and lifestyle plus standard smoking cessation active control (HLS + CBT). Outcomes for the 4-month period following the quit date are reported.
Treatment attendance and subjective ratings provide evidence for the feasibility and acceptability of the ERT + CBT intervention. Compared with the HLS + CBT control condition, the ERT + CBT condition demonstrated higher abstinence rates at 2 months (ERT + CBT = 23% vs. HLS + CBT = 0%, OR = 13.51; 95% CI = 0.70-261.59) and 4 months (ERT = 18% vs. HLS = 5%; OR = 2.98; 95% CI = 0.39-22.72) post-quit. Mean number of cigarettes per day was significantly lower in ERT + CBT at 2 months (ERT + CBT = 2.73 (3.35) vs. HLS + CBT = 5.84 (6.24); p = .05) but not at 4 months (ERT + CBT = 2.15 (3.17) vs. HLS + CBT = 5.18 (2.88); p = .06) post-quit.
The development and initial test of the ERT + CBT intervention supports its feasibility and acceptability in this difficult-to-treat population. Further development and testing in a Stage II randomized clinical trial are warranted.
Negative affect has been identified as a motivator for continued smoking during pregnancy. To date, smoking cessation interventions for pregnant smokers have not specifically addressed the role of negative affect as a smoking trigger. This treatment development pilot study provides support for the feasibility and acceptability of a multi-component ERT + CBT for low-income pregnant smokers who self-report smoking in response to negative affect. Study findings support further testing in a fully-powered Stage II efficacy trial powered to assess mediators and moderators of treatment effects.
消极情绪已被确定为影响孕期持续吸烟的一个因素。在本研究中,开发了一种多成分情绪调节干预措施,以应对引发吸烟的负面情绪,并在低收入怀孕吸烟者中进行了试点测试。评估了治疗的可行性和可接受性、可替宁验证的戒烟率以及自我报告的平均吸烟量。
自我报告因消极情绪而吸烟的怀孕吸烟者(N = 70)被随机分配接受两种为期8节的干预措施之一:(1)情绪调节治疗结合标准认知行为戒烟法(ERT + CBT)或(2)健康与生活方式加标准戒烟积极对照法(HLS + CBT)。报告了戒烟日期后4个月的结果。
治疗参与情况和主观评分证明了ERT + CBT干预措施的可行性和可接受性。与HLS + CBT对照条件相比,ERT + CBT条件在戒烟后2个月(ERT + CBT = 23% 对 HLS + CBT = 0%,OR = 13.51;95% CI = 0.70 - 261.59)和4个月(ERT = 18% 对 HLS = 5%;OR = 2.98;95% CI = 0.39 - 22.72)的戒烟率更高。ERT + CBT组在戒烟后2个月时每天的平均吸烟量显著更低(ERT + CBT = 2.73(3.35)对HLS + CBT = 5.84(6.24);p = 0.05),但在4个月时并非如此(ERT + CBT = 2.15(3.17)对HLS + CBT = 5.18(2.88);p = 0.06)。
ERT + CBT干预措施的开发和初步测试支持了其在这一难以治疗的人群中的可行性和可接受性。有必要在II期随机临床试验中进行进一步的开发和测试。
消极情绪已被确定为孕期持续吸烟的一个诱因。迄今为止,针对怀孕吸烟者的戒烟干预措施尚未具体解决消极情绪作为吸烟触发因素的作用。这项治疗开发试点研究为ERT + CBT多成分干预措施对因消极情绪而自我报告吸烟的低收入怀孕吸烟者的可行性和可接受性提供了支持。研究结果支持在一项有充分动力的II期疗效试验中进行进一步测试,该试验旨在评估治疗效果的中介因素和调节因素。