Suppr超能文献

人造玻璃纤维的分类:对国际癌症研究机构一个工作组重新评估的评论

Classification of man-made vitreous fibers: Comments on the revaluation by an IARC working group.

作者信息

Wardenbach P, Rödelsperger K, Roller M, Muhle H

机构信息

Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Safety and Health with Chemical and Biological Agents, Friedrich-Henkel-Weg 1-25, Dortmund 44149, Germany.

出版信息

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2005 Nov;43(2):181-93. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2005.06.011. Epub 2005 Aug 15.

Abstract

In 2001, an IARC working group revaluated the carcinogenic risks of man-made vitreous fibers (MMVF). Compared with the IARC evaluation in 1987, the overall evaluations of insulation glass wool, rock (stone) wool, and slag wool were changed from Group 2B to Group 3. These changes ensued from an alteration in the evidence for cancer in humans and in experimental animals: Instead of "sufficient," the evidence for cancer in experimental animals is now looked upon as "limited" if there is a carcinogenic response after intraperitoneal injection but not after recently conducted inhalation experiments. For these studies, it is argued that they did properly address the technological limitations of earlier inhalation experiments. For Maxim and McConnell [Maxim L.D., McConnell E.E., 2001. Interspecies comparisons of the toxicity of asbestos and synthetic vitreous fibers: a weight-of-the-evidence approach. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 33, 319-342], well-conducted inhalation studies are very sensitive and rats may be more sensitive than humans in detecting the carcinogenic potential of MMVF. However, their arguments are highly questionable. The explanations of the IARC working group for preferring the newer inhalation studies are not sufficiently supported by the published data. Having in mind the higher sensitivity of humans compared to rats after inhalation of asbestos, more emphasis should have been given to the carcinogenic response after intraperitoneal injection.

摘要

2001年,国际癌症研究机构(IARC)的一个工作组重新评估了人造玻璃纤维(MMVF)的致癌风险。与IARC 1987年的评估相比,绝缘玻璃棉、岩棉和矿渣棉的总体评估从2B组变为3组。这些变化源于人类和实验动物癌症证据的改变:如果腹腔注射后有致癌反应,但最近进行的吸入实验后没有,则实验动物的癌症证据现在被视为“有限”,而不是“充分”。对于这些研究,有人认为它们恰当地解决了早期吸入实验的技术局限性。对于马克西姆和麦康奈尔[马克西姆·L.D.,麦康奈尔·E.E.,2001年。石棉和合成玻璃纤维毒性的种间比较:一种证据权重方法。《毒理学与药理学监管》33卷,第319 - 342页]而言,精心开展的吸入研究非常敏感,并且在检测MMVF的致癌潜力方面,大鼠可能比人类更敏感。然而,他们的观点极具疑问。IARC工作组倾向于采用更新的吸入研究的解释,并未得到已发表数据的充分支持。考虑到吸入石棉后人类比大鼠更敏感,应该更重视腹腔注射后的致癌反应。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验