Suppr超能文献

在肺模型中对用于经气管喷射通气的低流量和高流量调节器的比较。

A comparison in a lung model of low- and high-flow regulators for transtracheal jet ventilation.

作者信息

Gaughan S D, Ozaki G T, Benumof J L

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, UCSD Medical Center 92103-8812.

出版信息

Anesthesiology. 1992 Jul;77(1):189-99. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199207000-00025.

Abstract

There is widespread agreement that transtracheal jet ventilation (TTJV) using a percutaneously inserted intravenous (iv) catheter through the cricothyroid membrane is a simple, quick, relatively safe, and extremely effective treatment for the situation in which neither ventilation nor intubation can be achieved. No study has reported whether a low-flow pressure-reducing regulator (LFR) can provide enough driving pressure and flow under a variety of clinical circumstances for adequate TTJV. We determined, using a high-flow regulator (HFR) as our control, the tidal volume (VT) (measured by integrating a pneumotachograph signal) that a LFR could deliver via a Carden jet injector through 14- and 20-G iv catheters initially at an inspiratory:expiratory ratio (I:E) = 1:1 (unit of time = 1 s) in a mechanical model that had varying lung compliance (Cset, 10-100 ml/cmH2O) and airway diameters (proximal trachea 15.0, 4.5, or 3.0 mm ID and distal mainstem bronchi 9.0 or 4.5 mm ID). The lowest Cset (10 ml/cmH2O) and smallest airway diameter (tracheal diameter = 3.0 mm, bronchial diameter = 9.0 mm) resulted in the lowest VT (220 and 320 ml for the 20- and 14-G iv catheters, respectively, with the LFR), and the highest Cset (100 ml/cmH2O) and largest airway diameter (tracheal diameter = 15 mm, bronchial diameter = 9.0 mm) resulted in the highest VT (780 and 1040 ml for the 20- and 14-G iv catheters, respectively, with the LFR). The VT produced during TTJV was greatly dependent on air entrainment (measured by a second pneumotachograph), with the contribution to total VT ranging from 15 to 74%; the amount of air entrainment was independently confirmed by excellent agreement between measured and calculated alveolar oxygen concentrations. Decreasing Cset (with the largest airway diameter) and decreasing airway diameter (at Cset = 50 ml/cmH2O) over the full range studied resulted in approximately a 45-80% decrease in VT for all iv catheter/regulator combinations. Increasing Cset and narrowing airway diameter over the full range studied resulted in a progressive increase in end-expiratory volume (EEV) for all iv catheter/regulator combinations. The I:E ratio was also varied from 1:3 to 3:1 (unit of time = 1 s) using the 14-G catheter at Cset = 50 ml/cmH2O with both regulators at the extremes of the proximal tracheal diameters (15.0 and 3.0 mm ID), and we found that jet ventilation through a proximal tracheal diameter of 3.0 mm with the HFR at I:E ratios = 1:1 and 3:1, EEV exceeded the capacity of the mechanical lung (4,000 ml).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

摘要

人们普遍认为,通过经皮插入的静脉导管穿过环甲膜进行经气管喷射通气(TTJV)是一种简单、快速、相对安全且极其有效的治疗方法,适用于无法实现通气或插管的情况。尚无研究报告低流量减压调节器(LFR)在各种临床情况下是否能提供足够的驱动压力和流量以实现充分的TTJV。我们以高流量调节器(HFR)作为对照,在一个具有不同肺顺应性(Cset,10 - 100 ml/cmH₂O)和气道直径(近端气管内径15.0、4.5或3.0 mm,远端主支气管内径9.0或4.5 mm)的机械模型中,测定LFR通过卡登喷射注射器经14号和20号静脉导管在吸气:呼气比(I:E)= 1:1(时间单位 = 1 s)时所能输送的潮气量(VT)(通过对呼吸流速仪信号进行积分测量)。最低的Cset(10 ml/cmH₂O)和最小的气道直径(气管直径 = 3.0 mm,支气管直径 = 9.0 mm)导致最低的VT(使用LFR时,20号和14号静脉导管分别为220和320 ml),而最高的Cset(100 ml/cmH₂O)和最大的气道直径(气管直径 = 15 mm,支气管直径 = 9.0 mm)导致最高的VT(使用LFR时,20号和14号静脉导管分别为780和1040 ml)。TTJV期间产生的VT很大程度上取决于空气夹带(通过第二个呼吸流速仪测量),其对总VT的贡献范围为15%至74%;通过测量和计算的肺泡氧浓度之间的良好一致性独立证实了空气夹带量。在所研究的整个范围内,降低Cset(在最大气道直径时)和减小气道直径(在Cset = 50 ml/cmH₂O时)导致所有静脉导管/调节器组合的VT大约降低45 - 80%。在所研究的整个范围内,增加Cset和缩小气道直径导致所有静脉导管/调节器组合的呼气末容积(EEV)逐渐增加。在Cset = 50 ml/cmH₂O时,使用14号导管,在近端气管直径的两个极端值(内径15.0和3.0 mm)下,两个调节器的I:E比也从1:3变化到3:1(时间单位 = 1 s),我们发现,在I:E比 = 1:1和3:1时,通过内径3.0 mm的近端气管使用HFR进行喷射通气时,EEV超过了机械肺的容量(4000 ml)。(摘要截断于400字)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验