Uysal Tancan, Sari Zafer
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Aug;128(2):226-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.04.029.
The aims of this study were to determine the size of individual permanent teeth, tooth-size ratios for the maxillary and mandibular dentitions, and sex differences for those variables in a Turkish population, and to compare the figures obtained with those of the Bolton analysis.
The data were derived from dental casts of 150 Turkish subjects (72 men, mean age 22.09 +/- 3.11 years; 78 women, mean age, 21.11 +/- 2.08 years) with normal occlusions. The mean, standard deviation, and minimum and maximum values were calculated for individual tooth size, and overall and anterior ratios, separately for men and women. To determine whether there are sex differences in intermaxillary tooth size discrepancies, an independent samples t test was performed.
The mesiodistal dimensions of the maxillary teeth showed greater variability than the mandibular teeth, with the first molar dimensions having the greatest variability. The overall and anterior ratios were found to be 89.88 +/- 2.29 and 78.26 +/- 2.61, respectively. A statistically significant sex difference was found only in overall ratio (P < .001). According to Bolton's mean values, a discrepancy in the overall ratio was found in 18% of Turkish normal occlusion subjects, and anterior ratios outside 2 standard deviations from the Bolton mean were found in 21.3% of our sample.
These findings indicate that population-specific standards are necessary for clinical assessments. Bolton's original data do not represent Turkish people, and therefore it is appropriate to use Turkish norms in daily orthodontic practice for Turkish patients.
本研究的目的是确定土耳其人群中恒牙个体大小、上下颌牙列的牙大小比例以及这些变量的性别差异,并将所得数据与博尔顿分析的数据进行比较。
数据来源于150名咬合正常的土耳其受试者(72名男性,平均年龄22.09±3.11岁;78名女性,平均年龄21.11±2.08岁)的牙模。分别计算男性和女性个体牙齿大小、整体及前部比例的均值、标准差、最小值和最大值。为确定上下颌牙齿大小差异是否存在性别差异,进行了独立样本t检验。
上颌牙齿的近远中径比下颌牙齿变异更大,其中第一磨牙的尺寸变异最大。整体比例和前部比例分别为89.88±2.29和78.26±2.61。仅在整体比例上发现了具有统计学意义的性别差异(P<.001)。根据博尔顿的均值,在18%的土耳其正常咬合受试者中发现整体比例存在差异,在我们样本的21.3%中发现前部比例超出博尔顿均值的2个标准差。
这些发现表明临床评估需要特定人群的标准。博尔顿的原始数据并不代表土耳其人,因此在日常正畸实践中为土耳其患者使用土耳其标准是合适的。