Alqahtani Hamad
Orthodontic department, faculty of dentistry, King Abdulaziz university, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia.
Saudi Dent J. 2023 Jul;35(5):498-507. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.03.006. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
This study aimed to establish intermaxillary tooth size ratios (overall index (OI) and anterior index (AI)) for normal occlusion and different Angle's malocclusions specific to the Saudi population and compare them to Bolton's values, which were specific to Americans.
The Saudi Digital Library, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Embase were searched systematically to acquire articles which reported OI and AI for Saudi patients; inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. Data, including author's name, publication year, city, measurement technique, number of subjects, type of occlusion, means, and standard deviations, were extracted and sorted. To assess the methodological quality of the included studies, The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies was utilized.
Of the 1473 articles, eight met the inclusion criteria and were included in the -analysis. Values for normal occlusion and Bolton's values were not significantly different. All malocclusion classes showed significant differences in the overall OI and AI values compared with Bolton's original values and values for normal occlusion, but they did not differ from each other. Gender showed an effect only on the OI ratio for Class III malocclusion.
Bolton's original values can be used in Saudi patients only with normal occlusion. For cases with any Angle's malocclusion, we recommend using an AI value of 79.08 (±3.4) for both genders. Classes I and II, regardless of gender, have the same OI value of 92.51 (±2.82). For Class III, values of 91.97 (±2.4) for females and 93.13 (±2.6) for males can be used.
本研究旨在确定沙特人群正常咬合及不同安氏错牙合的颌间牙大小比例(总体指数(OI)和前牙指数(AI)),并将其与特定于美国人的博尔顿值进行比较。
系统检索沙特数字图书馆、PubMed、科学网、考克兰图书馆、Scopus和Embase,以获取报告沙特患者OI和AI的文章;应用纳入和排除标准。提取并整理数据,包括作者姓名、出版年份、城市、测量技术、受试者数量、咬合类型、均值和标准差。为评估纳入研究的方法学质量,使用了美国国立心肺血液研究所观察性队列和横断面研究质量评估工具。
在1473篇文章中,8篇符合纳入标准并纳入分析。正常咬合的值与博尔顿值无显著差异。与博尔顿原始值和正常咬合值相比,所有错牙合类别在总体OI和AI值上均显示出显著差异,但它们彼此之间无差异。性别仅对III类错牙合的OI比例有影响。
博尔顿原始值仅适用于沙特正常咬合的患者。对于任何安氏错牙合病例,我们建议男女均使用AI值79.08(±3.4)。I类和II类错牙合,无论性别,OI值均为92.51(±2.82)。对于III类错牙合,女性可使用91.97(±2.4),男性可使用93.13(±2.6)。