Suppr超能文献

眼压笔对于测量先天性青光眼幼儿的眼压准确吗?

Is the tono-pen accurate for measuring intraocular pressure in young children with congenital glaucoma?

作者信息

Levy Jaime, Lifshitz Tova, Rosen Shirley, Tessler Zvi, Biedner Ben-Zion

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Soroka Medical Center, Beer-Sheva, Israel.

出版信息

J AAPOS. 2005 Aug;9(4):321-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2005.02.006.

Abstract

PURPOSE

We sought to compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements by Perkins tonometer and Tono-Pen in young children with primary congenital glaucoma (PCG).

METHODS

This was a retrospective comparative case series. We reviewed the clinical records of all children with primary congenital glaucoma who underwent examinations under general anesthesia at Soroka University Medical Center between January 1999 and July 2002. Our main outcome measures were IOP with Perkins hand-held tonometer and Tono-Pen tonometer.

RESULTS

A total of 28 eyes of 16 children were examined under general anesthesia. The mean IOP was 18 +/- 6 mm Hg with the Perkins tonometer and 22 +/- 8 mm Hg with the Tono-Pen. In 18 eyes, IOP was less than 21 mm Hg with the Perkins tonometer; these eyes had already undergone surgical procedures. The other 10 eyes with IOP greater than 21 mm Hg with the Perkins tonometer underwent surgery at the end of the examination under anesthesia. In eyes with IOP greater than 16 mm Hg (Group A, n = 18), a significant difference (P < 0.001) was found between the Perkins and Tono-Pen measurements, even although the values were strongly correlated (r = 0.60). In contrast, in eyes with IOP less than 16 mm Hg (Group B, n = 10) no statistically significant difference (P = 0.28) and good correlation (r = 0.78) were obtained. A difference of 5.8 +/- 3.8 mm Hg and 0.6 +/- 1.7 mm Hg between Perkins and Tono-Pen readings, respectively, was found in Groups A and B.

CONCLUSIONS

Tono-Pen readings disagree with Perkins tonometer measurements for measuring IOP in children with PCG who present with IOP greater than 16 mm Hg and tends to overestimate IOP. A further study with a similar population is necessary to confirm these results.

摘要

目的

我们旨在比较使用帕金斯眼压计和非接触眼压计测量原发性先天性青光眼(PCG)患儿的眼压(IOP)。

方法

这是一项回顾性比较病例系列研究。我们回顾了1999年1月至2002年7月期间在索罗卡大学医学中心接受全身麻醉检查的所有原发性先天性青光眼患儿的临床记录。我们的主要观察指标是使用帕金斯手持式眼压计和非接触眼压计测量的眼压。

结果

共有16名儿童的28只眼睛接受了全身麻醉检查。使用帕金斯眼压计时平均眼压为18±6 mmHg,使用非接触眼压计时为22±8 mmHg。18只眼睛使用帕金斯眼压计时眼压低于21 mmHg;这些眼睛已经接受了手术。另外10只使用帕金斯眼压计时眼压高于21 mmHg的眼睛在麻醉检查结束时接受了手术。在眼压高于16 mmHg的眼睛(A组,n = 18)中,尽管数值高度相关(r = 0.60),但帕金斯眼压计和非接触眼压计的测量结果仍存在显著差异(P < 0.001)。相比之下,在眼压低于16 mmHg的眼睛(B组,n = 10)中,未获得统计学上的显著差异(P = 0.28),但相关性良好(r = 0.78)。A组和B组中,帕金斯眼压计和非接触眼压计读数的差异分别为5.8±3.8 mmHg和0.6±1.7 mmHg。

结论

对于眼压高于16 mmHg的PCG患儿,非接触眼压计的读数与帕金斯眼压计的测量结果不一致,且倾向于高估眼压。需要对类似人群进行进一步研究以证实这些结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验