Levin Frances R, Evans Suzette M, Brooks Daniel J, Kalbag Aparna S, Garawi Fatima, Nunes Edward V
New York State Psychiatric Institute, Department of Psychiatry, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University, 1051 Riverside Drive, Unit 66, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2006 Feb 1;81(2):137-48. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2005.06.012. Epub 2005 Aug 15.
The purpose of this double-blind, three-arm, 12-week trial was to compare the efficacy of sustained-release methylphenidate or sustained-release bupropion to placebo in treating adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms. The randomized sample consisted of 98 methadone-maintained patients who were pre-dominantly male (57%) and 40% Caucasian, 40% Hispanic and 20% African American. All participants met DSM-IV criteria for adult ADHD, with 53% meeting DSM-IV criteria for cocaine dependence/abuse. In addition to medication and treatment as usual at a methadone program, individuals received weekly individual cognitive behavioral treatment. Other than current employment status, there were no significant demographic differences across the three treatment groups. Seventy percent completed the 12-week trial. There were no differences in retention rate based on treatment group. A reduction in ADHD symptoms using the adult ADHD rating scale was observed in all three groups, but there were no significant differences in outcome between treatments. The placebo response rate was high, with 46% of the placebo group self-reporting substantial improvement in their ADHD symptoms (>30% reduction in adult ADHD rating scale). Using other ADHD outcome measures, the placebo response and medication response rates were substantially lower. There was no evidence of misuse of medication or worsening of cocaine use among those randomized to methylphenidate. Taken together, sustained-release methylphenidate or sustained-release bupropion did not provide a clear advantage over placebo in reducing ADHD symptoms or additional cocaine use in methadone-maintained patients.
这项双盲、三臂、为期12周的试验旨在比较缓释哌甲酯或缓释安非他酮与安慰剂治疗成人注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)症状的疗效。随机样本包括98名以美沙酮维持治疗的患者,其中男性占多数(57%),40%为白种人,40%为西班牙裔,20%为非裔美国人。所有参与者均符合成人ADHD的DSM-IV标准,其中53%符合可卡因依赖/滥用的DSM-IV标准。除了在美沙酮项目中接受常规药物治疗和治疗外,个体还接受每周一次的个体认知行为治疗。除了当前就业状况外,三个治疗组在人口统计学上没有显著差异。70%的人完成了为期12周的试验。基于治疗组的留存率没有差异。在所有三个组中均观察到使用成人ADHD评定量表后ADHD症状有所减轻,但治疗之间的结果没有显著差异。安慰剂反应率很高,46%的安慰剂组自我报告其ADHD症状有显著改善(成人ADHD评定量表降低>30%)。使用其他ADHD结局指标时,安慰剂反应率和药物反应率显著较低。在随机接受哌甲酯治疗的患者中,没有药物滥用或可卡因使用恶化的证据。综上所述,在减轻美沙酮维持治疗患者的ADHD症状或额外的可卡因使用方面,缓释哌甲酯或缓释安非他酮相对于安慰剂没有明显优势。