Pillay Deenan, Green Hannah, Matthias Ryanne, Dunn David, Phillips Andrew, Sabin Caroline, Evans Barry
Centre for Virology, Royal Free and University College Medical School, University College, London, United Kingdom.
J Infect Dis. 2005 Sep 15;192(6):967-73. doi: 10.1086/432763. Epub 2005 Aug 12.
Good estimates of the prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus drug resistance are important for assessing requirements for new drug classes and modeling the spread of resistance. However, little consensus exists on optimal methodologies to generate such data. To compare methodologies, we used the national data set of resistance tests from >4000 patients in the United Kingdom performed between 1998 and 2002. When single-time-point analysis (method 1) was used, the proportion of tests with any form of resistance was approximately 80%, with little time trend. When a cumulative model of resistance (method 2) was used and placed in the context of all treated patients, the prevalence of any resistance increased by year, reaching 17% of treated patients in 2002. Method 2 also nearly doubles estimates of numbers of individuals infected with multiclass drug-resistant virus. Our results identify an urgent need for new drugs within existing classes and new classes of antiretroviral therapy.
准确估算人类免疫缺陷病毒耐药性的流行情况对于评估新型药物类别的需求以及模拟耐药性传播至关重要。然而,对于生成此类数据的最佳方法,目前几乎没有达成共识。为了比较不同方法,我们使用了1998年至2002年间在英国对4000多名患者进行的耐药性检测国家数据集。采用单时间点分析(方法1)时,出现任何形式耐药性的检测比例约为80%,且几乎没有时间趋势。当使用耐药性累积模型(方法2)并结合所有接受治疗的患者情况时,任何耐药性的流行率逐年上升,到2002年达到接受治疗患者的17%。方法2还使感染多类别耐药病毒个体数量的估计值几乎增加了一倍。我们的结果表明,迫切需要现有类别中的新药以及新型抗逆转录病毒疗法。