• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

年龄和合并症是否会影响药物治疗控制不佳的糖尿病的治疗强度?

Do age and comorbidity affect intensity of pharmacological therapy for poorly controlled diabetes mellitus?

作者信息

Chaudhry Sarwat I, Berlowitz Dan R, Concato John

机构信息

Clinical Epidemiology Research Center, Department of Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Jul;53(7):1214-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53370.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53370.x
PMID:16108941
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To examine the influence of age and comorbidity on intensification of medical therapy for patients with poorly controlled diabetes mellitus (DM).

DESIGN

Observational cohort study using data from Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) national databases.

SETTING

Thirteen VA medical centers in New England, Florida, and Puerto Rico.

PARTICIPANTS

Veterans (N=5,317) with poorly controlled DM receiving regular medical care

MEASUREMENTS

An increase in hypoglycemic medications, or intensification of therapy, was considered present at the visit if a new hypoglycemic medication was started or the dosage of an existing medication was increased.

RESULTS

The overall rate of intensification of therapy was 20.8% (1,106/5,317). The rate of intensification was highest in the youngest patients without comorbidity (24.5%) and lowest in the oldest patients with comorbidity (15.7%) (P<.001).

CONCLUSION

Rates of intensification at a single clinic visit were quite low in all groups and were lowest in older patients with comorbidity.

摘要

目的

探讨年龄和合并症对糖尿病控制不佳患者强化药物治疗的影响。

设计

利用退伍军人事务部(VA)国家数据库的数据进行观察性队列研究。

地点

新英格兰、佛罗里达和波多黎各的13家VA医疗中心。

参与者

接受常规医疗护理的糖尿病控制不佳的退伍军人(N = 5317)

测量指标

如果开始使用新的降糖药物或增加现有药物的剂量,则在此次就诊时视为降糖药物增加或治疗强化。

结果

治疗强化的总体发生率为20.8%(1106/5317)。在无合并症的最年轻患者中强化率最高(24.5%),在有合并症的最年长患者中强化率最低(15.7%)(P<0.001)。

结论

所有组在单次就诊时的强化率都相当低,在有合并症的老年患者中最低。

相似文献

1
Do age and comorbidity affect intensity of pharmacological therapy for poorly controlled diabetes mellitus?年龄和合并症是否会影响药物治疗控制不佳的糖尿病的治疗强度?
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Jul;53(7):1214-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53370.x.
2
Predictors of medication nonadherence among patients with diabetes in Medicare Part D programs: a retrospective cohort study.医疗保险处方药计划中糖尿病患者药物不依从的预测因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
Clin Ther. 2009 Oct;31(10):2178-88; discussion 2150-1. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.10.002.
3
Differential medication adherence among patients with schizophrenia and comorbid diabetes and hypertension.精神分裂症合并糖尿病和高血压患者的药物依从性差异
Psychiatr Serv. 2007 Feb;58(2):207-12. doi: 10.1176/ps.2007.58.2.207.
4
Variation in antidiabetic medication intensity among Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes mellitus.患有糖尿病的医疗保险受益人群中抗糖尿病药物治疗强度的差异。
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2007 Sep;5(3):195-208. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2007.10.004.
5
Multiple medication adherence and its effect on clinical outcomes among patients with comorbid type 2 diabetes and hypertension.合并 2 型糖尿病和高血压患者的多重药物依从性及其对临床结局的影响。
Med Care. 2013 Oct;51(10):879-87. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31829fa8ed.
6
Measures of adherence to oral hypoglycemic agents at the primary care clinic level: the role of risk adjustment.基层医疗诊所口服降糖药依从性的衡量指标:风险调整的作用。
Med Care. 2012 Jul;50(7):591-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318249cb74.
7
Medication regimen complexity in patients with uncontrolled hypertension and/or diabetes.未控制的高血压和/或糖尿病患者的药物治疗方案复杂性。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2013 Jul-Aug;53(4):427-31. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2013.13003.
8
An observational study examining the effect of comorbidity on the rates of persistence and adherence to newly initiated oral anti-hyperglycaemic agents.一项观察性研究,考察合并症对新开始使用的口服抗高血糖药物的持续用药率和依从率的影响。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013 Dec;22(12):1336-44. doi: 10.1002/pds.3535. Epub 2013 Oct 21.
9
The association between co-morbidity and the use of antidiabetics or adjunctive cardiovascular medicines in Australian veterans with diabetes.澳大利亚糖尿病退伍军人共病与使用抗糖尿病药物或心血管辅助药物的相关性。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011 Jan;91(1):115-20. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2010.10.006. Epub 2010 Nov 9.
10
Discontinuation of diabetes and lipid-lowering medications after bariatric surgery at Veterans Affairs medical centers.退伍军人事务医疗中心行减重手术后停止使用糖尿病和降脂药物。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010 Nov-Dec;6(6):601-7. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2010.07.005. Epub 2010 Jul 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Delays in Insulin Initiation among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Southeast China: A Retrospective, Real-World Study.中国东南部2型糖尿病患者胰岛素起始治疗延迟情况:一项回顾性真实世界研究
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2020 Aug 25;13:3059-3068. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S256381. eCollection 2020.
2
A Real-World Observational Study of Time to Treatment Intensification Among Elderly Patients with Inadequately Controlled Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.一项真实世界观察性研究:老年 2 型糖尿病控制不佳患者的治疗强化时间。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015 Dec;21(12):1184-93. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2015.21.12.1184.
3
The Effect of Comorbidity on Glycemic Control and Systolic Blood Pressure in Type 2 Diabetes: A Cohort Study with 5 Year Follow-Up in Primary Care.
共病对2型糖尿病患者血糖控制和收缩压的影响:一项在基层医疗中进行的为期5年随访的队列研究。
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 1;10(10):e0138662. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138662. eCollection 2015.
4
Medication Adherence Does Not Explain Black-White Differences in Cardiometabolic Risk Factor Control among Insured Patients with Diabetes.药物依从性并不能解释糖尿病参保患者中黑人和白人在心血管代谢危险因素控制方面的差异。
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Feb;31(2):188-195. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3486-0.
5
Improving preclinic preparation for patients with chronic conditions in quito, ecuador: a randomized controlled trial.改善厄瓜多尔基多慢性病患者的临床前准备:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Family Med. 2015;2015:724245. doi: 10.1155/2015/724245. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
6
Community Health Workers: A Missing Piece of the Puzzle for Complex Patients With Diabetes?社区卫生工作者:复杂糖尿病患者拼图中缺失的一块?
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Jul;30(7):878-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3320-8.
7
Establishing visit priorities for complex patients: A summary of the literature and conceptual model to guide innovative interventions.确定复杂患者的就诊优先级:文献综述与指导创新干预措施的概念模型
Healthc (Amst). 2013 Dec;1(3-4):117-122. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2013.07.008.
8
Efficacy and safety of insulin glargine compared to other interventions in younger and older adults: a pooled analysis of nine open-label, randomized controlled trials in patients with type 2 diabetes.胰岛素甘精与其他干预措施在年轻和老年 2 型糖尿病患者中的疗效和安全性比较:9 项开放标签、随机对照试验的汇总分析。
Drugs Aging. 2013 Jun;30(6):429-38. doi: 10.1007/s40266-013-0069-9.
9
Differential effects of comorbidity on antihypertensive and glucose-regulating treatment in diabetes mellitus--a cohort study.合并症对糖尿病患者降压及血糖调节治疗的不同影响——一项队列研究
PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e38707. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038707. Epub 2012 Jun 5.
10
Influence of patient age and comorbid burden on clinician attitudes toward heart failure guidelines.患者年龄和共病负担对临床医生对心力衰竭指南态度的影响。
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2012 Jun;10(3):211-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2012.04.003. Epub 2012 May 12.