Loughran S, Tennant N, Kishore A, Swan I R C
Medical Research Council, Institute of Hearing Research, Scottish Section, Glasgow, UK.
Clin Otolaryngol. 2005 Jun;30(3):255-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.2005.00988.x.
To assess the interobserver reliability in assessing postural stability and to compare with results obtained by computerized posturography.
Cross-sectional study.
Balance clinic, teaching hospital.
81 patients attending with a primary complaint of imbalance.
Inter-rater reliability between two clinicians and the modified Clinical Test for the Sensory Interaction on Balance (mCTSIB) as assessed by the Neurocom VSR Balance Master platform.
Inter-rater reliability scores were high (0.53-0.81) for all conditions of the mCTSIB except for the easiest, i.e. firm surface eyes open, where concordance levels were poor to fair.
Overall there was good agreement between observers and the computerized mCTSIB.
评估评估姿势稳定性时观察者间的可靠性，并与计算机化姿势描记法获得的结果进行比较。
横断面研究。
教学医院的平衡诊所。
81名以平衡失调为主诉前来就诊的患者。
两名临床医生之间的评分者间可靠性，以及通过Neurocom VSR平衡大师平台评估的改良平衡感觉交互临床测试（mCTSIB）。
除了最容易的条件，即睁眼在坚实表面上，mCTSIB所有条件下的评分者间可靠性得分都很高（0.53 - 0.81），此时一致性水平为差到一般。
总体而言，观察者与计算机化mCTSIB之间有良好的一致性。
