Suppr超能文献

眶额叶在情绪性与认知性观点采择中的不同作用。

Differential role of the orbital frontal lobe in emotional versus cognitive perspective-taking.

作者信息

Hynes Catherine A, Baird Abigail A, Grafton Scott T

机构信息

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, 6162 Moore Hall, Hanover, NH 03755, USA.

出版信息

Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(3):374-83. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.06.011. Epub 2005 Aug 19.

Abstract

Lesions of the orbital frontal lobe, particularly its medial sectors, are known to cause deficits in empathic ability, whereas the role of this region in theory of mind processing is the subject of some controversy. In a functional magnetic resonance imaging study with healthy participants, emotional perspective-taking was contrasted with cognitive perspective-taking in order to examine the role of the orbital frontal lobe in subcomponents of theory of mind processing. Subjects responded to a series of scenarios presented visually in three conditions: emotional perspective-taking, cognitive perspective-taking and a control condition that required inferential reasoning, but not perspective-taking. Group results demonstrated that the medial orbitofrontal lobe, defined as Brodmann's areas 11 and 25, was preferentially involved in emotional as compared to cognitive perspective-taking. This finding is both consistent with the lesion literature, and resolves the inconsistency of orbital frontal findings in the theory of mind literature.

摘要

已知眶额叶,尤其是其内侧部分的损伤会导致共情能力缺陷,而该区域在心理理论加工中的作用存在一定争议。在一项针对健康参与者的功能磁共振成像研究中,将情感观点采择与认知观点采择进行对比,以检验眶额叶在心理理论加工子成分中的作用。受试者在三种条件下对一系列视觉呈现的情景做出反应:情感观点采择、认知观点采择以及一个需要推理但不需要观点采择的对照条件。组间结果表明,定义为布罗德曼区11和25的内侧眶额叶在情感观点采择中比在认知观点采择中更易被激活。这一发现既与损伤研究文献一致,也解决了心理理论文献中眶额叶研究结果的不一致性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验