Scheid Teresa L
Department of Sociology and Anthropology, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, USA.
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2005 Nov-Dec;28(6):670-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2005.04.003. Epub 2005 Aug 19.
In a controversial expansion of workplace civil rights, the 1990 Americans with Disability Act (ADA) extended anti-discrimination protection to individuals with "mental impairments." One of the most critical barriers to the employment of individuals with mental disabilities is the degree of social stigma such disabilities incur, and there is compelling evidence that employers have stigmatizing attitudes and have discriminated against those with mental disabilities. This study examines the role played by stigma in employers' response to the 1990 Americans with Disability Act (ADA). A stratified sample of one hundred ninety employers were surveyed in 1996-1997 in a major Southern metropolitan area. Telephone interviews were completed with one hundred seventeen employers (response rate of 61.6%). The article describes employers' experiences with employees with mental disabilities and accommodations, specific employment practices, and attitudes towards those with mental disabilities. Stigma played an important role in conformity to the ADA (operationalized as either hiring or having specific recruiting policies for hiring individuals with mental disabilities). Furthermore, employers expressing coercive (fear of a lawsuit) as opposed to normative (belief that it is the right thing to do) rationales for compliance were more likely to hold stigmatized attitudes. Employers' beliefs about mental disability form a crucial foundation for truly supportive work environments (those that value difference and diversity), and further research is needed to determine if over time the ADA is successful in changing attitudes as well as behavior.
在一项颇具争议的职场民权扩张举措中,1990年的《美国残疾人法案》(ADA)将反歧视保护范围扩大至患有“精神障碍”的个人。对患有精神残疾的个人而言,就业面临的最关键障碍之一是此类残疾所带来的社会污名化程度,而且有确凿证据表明雇主持有污名化态度,并歧视患有精神残疾的人。本研究考察了污名在雇主对1990年《美国残疾人法案》(ADA)的反应中所起的作用。1996年至1997年,在南方一个主要大都市地区对190名雇主进行了分层抽样调查。对117名雇主进行了电话访谈(回复率为61.6%)。本文描述了雇主与患有精神残疾的员工打交道的经历、便利措施、具体的雇佣做法以及对患有精神残疾者的态度。污名在遵守《美国残疾人法案》(具体表现为雇佣患有精神残疾的人或制定特定的招聘政策来雇佣他们)方面起到了重要作用。此外,那些表示出于强制(担心诉讼)而非规范(认为这样做是正确的)理由而遵守规定的雇主,更有可能持有污名化态度。雇主对精神残疾的看法是真正支持性工作环境(重视差异和多样性的环境)的关键基础,还需要进一步研究以确定随着时间推移,《美国残疾人法案》是否能成功改变态度和行为。