• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

支持患有精神疾病的员工并减少工作场所与精神疾病相关的耻辱感:专家调查。

Supporting employees with mental illness and reducing mental illness-related stigma in the workplace: an expert survey.

机构信息

Centre Fòrum Research Unit, Institute of Neuropsychiatry and Addiction (INAD), Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain.

Mental Health Research Group, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2023 Apr;273(3):739-753. doi: 10.1007/s00406-022-01443-3. Epub 2022 Jul 22.

DOI:10.1007/s00406-022-01443-3
PMID:35867155
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9305029/
Abstract

An expert survey was designed to support the development of a workplace-based multi-country intervention tackling depression, anxiety, and mental illness-related stigma in small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Academic experts and representatives of SME organisations, specific sector organisations, labour or advocacy groups, and occupational health organisations, were contacted across eight European countries and Australia. The survey comprised closed and open text questions to assess expert opinion about interventions for employees with mental health difficulties, interventions supporting their managers, and anti-stigma interventions. The survey was available in six languages. The online platform Qualtrics was used for data collection. Quantitative data was analysed through descriptive statistics and qualitative data was analysed through thematic analysis. Sixty-five of 146 experts responded, representing a 42% response rate. Results showed only 26.2% of experts agreed that employees could speak openly about mental health issues, and 81.5% of experts indicated a large or medium unmet need for support for employees with mental health issues. Psychoeducational materials, face-to-face workshops and interventions based on cognitive behavioural therapy were ranked most likely to be taken up by employees. Experts rated as most useful for managers' guidelines on how to act if an employee has mental health issues (67.7%). The greatest number of experts indicated workshops of people with lived experience of mental illness (80.0%) and awareness campaigns (78.5%) were most required to tackle stigma. Responses were consistent between experts from different countries and areas of expertise. Experts in this multinational survey assessed that interventions supporting mental health in the workplace and tackling stigma are greatly needed. A multicomponent intervention with a wide range of materials and tools is supported.

摘要

一项专家调查旨在支持制定一项基于工作场所的多国干预措施,以解决中小企业(SMEs)中与抑郁、焦虑和精神疾病相关的污名问题。在八个欧洲国家和澳大利亚联系了学术专家和中小企业组织代表、特定部门组织、劳工或倡导团体以及职业健康组织。该调查包括封闭式和开放式文本问题,以评估专家对员工心理健康问题干预措施、支持其经理的干预措施以及反污名干预措施的意见。该调查提供六种语言版本。使用在线平台 Qualtrics 进行数据收集。通过描述性统计分析对定量数据进行分析,通过主题分析对定性数据进行分析。在 146 名专家中,有 65 名做出了回应,回应率为 42%。结果表明,只有 26.2%的专家同意员工可以公开谈论心理健康问题,81.5%的专家表示,员工对心理健康问题的支持存在很大或中等的未满足需求。心理教育材料、面对面研讨会和基于认知行为疗法的干预措施被认为最有可能被员工接受。专家们认为,如果员工有心理健康问题,经理的指导方针(即如何采取行动)最有用(67.7%)。表示最需要开展有精神疾病经历的人工作坊(80.0%)和宣传活动(78.5%)以解决污名问题的专家人数最多。不同国家和专业领域的专家的回应一致。这项多国家调查的专家评估认为,支持工作场所心理健康和解决污名问题的干预措施非常需要。支持使用广泛的材料和工具的多组分干预措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/730e/10085941/78ac250b7901/406_2022_1443_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/730e/10085941/dcac778f7210/406_2022_1443_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/730e/10085941/5a34780cfd11/406_2022_1443_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/730e/10085941/78ac250b7901/406_2022_1443_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/730e/10085941/dcac778f7210/406_2022_1443_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/730e/10085941/5a34780cfd11/406_2022_1443_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/730e/10085941/78ac250b7901/406_2022_1443_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Supporting employees with mental illness and reducing mental illness-related stigma in the workplace: an expert survey.支持患有精神疾病的员工并减少工作场所与精神疾病相关的耻辱感:专家调查。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2023 Apr;273(3):739-753. doi: 10.1007/s00406-022-01443-3. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
2
Promoting employee wellbeing and preventing non-clinical mental health problems in the workplace: a preparatory consultation survey.促进员工福祉并预防工作场所的非临床心理健康问题:一项筹备性咨询调查。
J Occup Med Toxicol. 2023 Aug 15;18(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12995-023-00378-2.
3
Implementation and evaluation of a multi-level mental health promotion intervention for the workplace (MENTUPP): study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.多层面职场心理健康促进干预措施(MENTUPP)的实施和评估:一项群组随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2023 Sep 30;24(1):621. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07537-0.
4
Mental Health Promotion and Intervention in Occupational Settings: Protocol for a Pilot Study of the MENTUPP Intervention.职业环境中的心理健康促进和干预:MENTUPP 干预的试点研究方案。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 15;19(2):947. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020947.
5
Managers' awareness of mental health measures for their employees in small and medium-sized enterprises in a depopulated mountainous area in Japan: A qualitative study.日本人口稀少山区中小企业管理人员对员工心理健康措施的认知:一项定性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Mar 4;101(9):e28999. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028999.
6
The web of silence: a qualitative case study of early intervention and support for healthcare workers with mental ill-health.沉默之网:对患有精神疾病的医护人员进行早期干预和支持的定性案例研究
BMC Public Health. 2014 Feb 8;14:138. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-138.
7
The significance of managers' knowledge of common mental disorders on managerial stigma towards employee depression: a cross-sectional study in Sweden.管理者对常见精神障碍的了解对其员工抑郁症管理耻辱感的影响:瑞典的一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Feb 5;24(1):378. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17577-5.
8
The effectiveness of interventions targeting the stigma of mental illness at the workplace: a systematic review.针对工作场所精神疾病污名化的干预措施的有效性:一项系统综述。
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Jan 6;16:1. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0706-4.
9
Promoting mental health in small-medium enterprises: an evaluation of the "Business in Mind" program.促进中小企业的心理健康:对“心系企业”项目的评估。
BMC Public Health. 2009 Jul 15;9:239. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-239.
10
Developing a framework for evaluation: a Theory of Change for complex workplace mental health interventions.制定评估框架:复杂工作场所心理健康干预的变革理论。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jun 17;23(1):1171. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16092-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Attitude and Perceptions of Technology Enabled Mental Health Care for Supporting Occupational Mental Health and Well Being Among Doctors in India.印度医生对支持职业心理健康与福祉的技术赋能心理健康护理的态度与认知
Indian J Occup Environ Med. 2025 Apr-Jun;29(2):154-159. doi: 10.4103/ijoem.ijoem_144_24. Epub 2025 Jun 13.
2
Managers' Use of Organizational Resources when Supporting Employees with Common Mental Disorders: A Swedish Qualitative Study.管理者在支持患有常见精神障碍的员工时对组织资源的利用:一项瑞典的定性研究。
J Occup Rehabil. 2025 Apr 19. doi: 10.1007/s10926-025-10293-4.
3
Mental Health Stigma in the Workplace and its Association with Possible Actions of Managers to Prevent Sickness Absence of Employees with Mental Health Problems in the Swedish Private Sector: a Video Vignette Study.

本文引用的文献

1
The association between stigmatizing attitudes towards depression and help seeking attitudes in college students.大学生对抑郁症的污名化态度与寻求帮助态度之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 18;17(2):e0263622. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263622. eCollection 2022.
2
Mental Health Promotion and Intervention in Occupational Settings: Protocol for a Pilot Study of the MENTUPP Intervention.职业环境中的心理健康促进和干预:MENTUPP 干预的试点研究方案。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 15;19(2):947. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020947.
3
Workplace interventions to reduce depression and anxiety in small and medium-sized enterprises: A systematic review.
瑞典私营部门工作场所的心理健康污名化及其与管理人员为预防有心理健康问题的员工病假而可能采取的行动之间的关联:一项视频短片研究
J Occup Rehabil. 2024 Jul 11. doi: 10.1007/s10926-024-10220-z.
4
Factors influencing employers' support for employees with acquired brain injuries or mental illness to return to- and stay in work: A qualitative systematic review.影响雇主支持脑损伤或精神疾病员工重返和留任工作的因素:定性系统评价。
Work. 2024;79(1):93-121. doi: 10.3233/WOR-230214.
5
Implementing a complex mental health intervention in occupational settings: process evaluation of the MENTUPP pilot study.在职业环境中实施复杂的心理健康干预措施:MENTUPP 试点研究的过程评估。
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 14;13(12):e077093. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077093.
6
Overcoming treatment gaps in the management of depression with non-pharmacological adjunctive strategies.采用非药物辅助策略克服抑郁症管理中的治疗差距。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Nov 28;14:1268194. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1268194. eCollection 2023.
7
Leveraging behavioral science and artificial intelligence to support mental health in the workplace: a pilot study.利用行为科学和人工智能来支持职场心理健康:一项试点研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Oct 19;14:1219229. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1219229. eCollection 2023.
8
Implementation and evaluation of a multi-level mental health promotion intervention for the workplace (MENTUPP): study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.多层面职场心理健康促进干预措施(MENTUPP)的实施和评估:一项群组随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2023 Sep 30;24(1):621. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07537-0.
9
Values and preferences related to workplace mental health programs and interventions: An international survey.与工作场所心理健康计划和干预措施相关的价值观和偏好:一项国际调查。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 27;18(9):e0283057. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283057. eCollection 2023.
10
Promoting employee wellbeing and preventing non-clinical mental health problems in the workplace: a preparatory consultation survey.促进员工福祉并预防工作场所的非临床心理健康问题:一项筹备性咨询调查。
J Occup Med Toxicol. 2023 Aug 15;18(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12995-023-00378-2.
工作场所干预措施减少中小企业的抑郁和焦虑:系统评价。
J Affect Disord. 2021 Jul 1;290:378-386. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.04.071. Epub 2021 May 1.
4
Depression-related stigma among primary care providers.初级保健提供者中与抑郁症相关的污名化现象。
Ment Health Clin. 2021 May 12;11(3):175-180. doi: 10.9740/mhc.2021.05.175. eCollection 2021 May.
5
Mental health matters.心理健康至关重要。
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Nov;8(11):e1352. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30432-0.
6
Work-Related Psychosocial Stress in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: An Integrative Review.工作相关的中小微企业心理社会压力:综合述评。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 13;17(20):7446. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207446.
7
The Skidmore Anxiety Stigma Scale (SASS): A covert and brief self-report measure.斯凯德焦虑耻辱量表(SASS):一种隐蔽且简短的自评量表。
J Anxiety Disord. 2020 Aug;74:102259. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102259. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
8
Mental Health Stigma and Wellbeing Among Commercial Construction Workers: A Mixed Methods Study.商业建筑工人的心理健康污名和幸福感:混合方法研究。
J Occup Environ Med. 2020 Aug;62(8):e423-e430. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001929.
9
Effect of Internet vs Face-to-Face Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Health Anxiety: A Randomized Noninferiority Clinical Trial.互联网与面对面认知行为疗法治疗健康焦虑的效果比较:一项随机非劣效性临床试验。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2020 Sep 1;77(9):915-924. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.0940.
10
Self-labeling as having a mental or physical illness: the effects of stigma and implications for help-seeking.自我诊断为患有精神或身体疾病:污名化的影响及其对寻求帮助的影响。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2020 Jul;55(7):907-916. doi: 10.1007/s00127-019-01787-7. Epub 2019 Oct 22.